MR. H. KISHETO SUMI v. THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 2 ORS
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2024-03-26. MR. H. KISHETO SUMI v. THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 2 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. 1/2 GAHC020004872023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : WP(C)/203/2023 MR. H. KISHETO SUMI S/O HETHAVI SEMA, R/O HOUSE NO 96, SHOIPU VILLAGE, DISTRICT ZUNHEBOTO 798620, NAGALAND VERSUS THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 2 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER SECRETARY/ SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC DEPARTMENT (PHED), GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND, KOHIMA, NAGALAND 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY/ SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND KOHIMA NAGALAND 3:THE CHIEF ENGINEER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLCI HEALTH ENGINEERING GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND KOHIMA NAGALAN Advocate for the Petitioner : A. ZHIMOMI Advocate for the Respondent : GOVT ADV NL Page No. 2/2 BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 26-03-2024 Heard Mr. A. Zhimomi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. V. Suokhrie, learned Additional Advocate General, Nagaland for the State respondents.
It is submitted by Mr. Zhimomi, learned counsel for the petitioner that by an Office Order bearing no. CE/PHE/EST-WC/R-30/2016/9829-33 dated 21. 02. 2022 passed under the hand of the Additional Chief Engineer & HoD, O/o the Chief Engineer, PHED, Nagaland, Kohima, the services of the petitioner, Kisheto H. has been regularised as R/Jugali against a post created vide Cabinet Approval no. CAB- 1/14/2023 dated 23. 01. 2024 w. e. f. 23. 08. 2019. Mr. Zhimomi, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as during the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner has got the necessary relief, the writ petition is not required to be proceeded with further. Projecting the above facts, Mr. Zhimomi, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the writ petition can be closed, at this stage, reserving the liberty to the petitioner to approach again in the event of any subsequent cause of action. Ms.
Suokhrie, learned Additional Advocate General, Nagaland has agreed to the said submission. A copy of the said Office Order dated 21. 02. 2024, mentioned above, has been placed before the Court by Mr. Zhimomi, learned counsel for the petitioner and the said Office Order be kept as part of the case record. The writ petition is accordingly closed, reserving the liberty to the petitioner, as prayed for. Sd/- JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.