NIRANJAN MANDAL ALIAS NIRANJAN KR MANDAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2020-12-18. NIRANJAN MANDAL ALIAS NIRANJAN KR MANDAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 10108 of 2020 ------ 1. Niranjan Mandal @ Niranjan Kr. Mandal 2. Sumit Mandal @ Sumit Kr. Mandal 3. Hiralal Mandal 4. Sukhdeo Mandal … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioners : Mr. R. S. Mazumdar, Sr. Adv. For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Srivastava, Addl. P. P. For the Informant : Mr. Suraj Singh, Adv. ------ 02 /18. 12. 2020 Heard the parties through video conferencing. ] Learned senior counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter within two weeks after the lockdown is over. In view of personal undertaking given by the learned senior counsel for the petitioners, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are ignored for the present. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Ramgarh P. S. Case No. 57 of 2020 corresponding to G. R. No.
884 of 2020 registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 447, 341, 342, 307, 302 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned senior counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioner No. 4 who is the father of the petitioner No. 3 and grand-father of the petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 have murdered the son of the petitioner No. 4. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is next submitted that for the self-same occurrence, from the side of the petitioners, petitioner No. 2 has lodged Ramgarh P. S. Case No. 58 of 2020. It is further submitted that there was a land dispute between the parties and there was a free-fight, in which the victim sustained injuries and the petitioner No. 2 has also sustained serious injuries. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not disturb or annoy the informant in any manner during the trial.
It is lastly submitted that the petitioner Nos. 1, 2 and 4 have been in custody since 27. 05. 2020 and petitioner No. 3 has been in custody since 22. 06. 2020 as is mentioned in para-14 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioners be released on bail. Learned Addl. P. P. appearing for the State being assisted by the learned counsel for the informant oppose the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial st Magistrate, 1 Class, Dumka in connection with Ramgarh P. S. Case No. 57 of 2020 corresponding to G. R. No. 884 of 2020 with the condition that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not disturb or annoy the informant in any manner during the trial. Animesh/ (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J. )
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.