Skip to main content
LawSphereX

Smt. Niva Mali v. Shri Goutam Mali

Court: High Court of Tripura

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE DR. T. AMARNATH GOUD,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BISWAJIT PALIT

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Tripura judgment dated 2026-04-24. Smt. Niva Mali v. Shri Goutam Mali. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

( 2026:THC:518-DB ) HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA Cont. Cas(C) 57 of 2025 Smt. Niva Mali, wife of Shri Goutam Mali, daughter of Birendra Malakar, presently residing at Wireless Colony, New Sitala Bari, P. O. & P. S. Badarpur, District- Karimganj, Assam- 788806 …….. Petitioner(s) Versus Shri Goutam Mali, son of late Narendra Mali, resident of N. F. Railway Colony, P. O. & P. S. Badarpur, District- Karimganj, Assam-788806. ………. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tapas Kumar Deb, Advocate Mr. Debabrata De, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bikram Paul, Advocate Ms. S. Deb (Gupta), Advocate Mr. Ratnadeep Gupta, Advocate Ms. Saswati Kar (Gupta), Advocate HON’BLE JUSTICE DR. T. AMARNATH GOUD HON’BLE MR JUSTICE BISWAJIT PALIT ORDER 24. 04.

2026 [1] This present petition is filed under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India for drawing up proceeding against the appellant(respondent herein) for disobedience of the judgment and order dated 05. 11. 2024 passed by this Court in Mat. App. No. 07 of 2024. [2] When the case is called, Ms. S. Deb (Gupta), learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent-husband and has placed before this Court a document showing that Rupees 10 lakhs has already been credited to the account of the petitioner-wife and the same is taken on record. [3] On perusal of Registry’s note dated 16. 03. 2026, it is seen that in compliance to order of this Court dated 27. 02. 2026 passed in Cont. Cas(C) No. 57 of 2025, Mr. Bikram Paul, learned counsel for the respondent has submitted a compliance report stating that on 02. 03. 2026, the respondent-husband has deposited Rs.

10,00,000/- in the account of the petitioner-wife and also deposited the cost amounting to Rs. 25,000/- in the High Court Bar Association on 05. 03. 2026. [4] In view of the above, this Court is of the view that there survives nothing for adjudication in the present contempt case and thus, the same stands closed. Biswajit Palit, J. Dr. T. Amarnath Goud, J. Sabyasachi. G.

Source: High Court of Tripura. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.