Skip to main content
LawSphereX

MOHAMMED MUSLIYAR v. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER TIRUR

Court: High Court of Kerala

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2024-08-05. MOHAMMED MUSLIYAR v. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER TIRUR. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C. P. TH MONDAY, THE 5 DAY OF AUGUST 2024 / 14TH SRAVANA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 40732 OF 2023 PETITIONER: MOHAMMED MUSLIYAR AGED 80 YEARS S/O. AHAMMED KUTTY @ AYAMUTTY, KADAVANDY HOUSE, INDIANOOR P. O. , KOTTAKKAL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676503; REPRESENTED BY ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, A. B. VINOD, AGED 49 YEARS, S/O. BHASKARAN, ALPPARA HOUSE, THENKARA P. O, MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. , PIN - 678582 BY ADVS. JACOB SEBASTIAN WINSTON K. V ANU JACOB RESPONDENTS: 1 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER TIRUR OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUR P. O. , MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. , PIN - 676301 2 THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KOTTAKKAL VILLAGE, KOTTAKKAL P. O. , MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. , PIN - 676503 3 THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER FOR THE KOTTAKKAL MUNICIPALITY AGRICULTURE OFFICE, KOTTAKKAL P. O. , MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

, PIN - 676503 4 THE LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE FOR THE KOTTAKKAL MUNICIPALITY CONSTITUTED UNDER THE CONSERVATION OF PADDY LAND AND WETLAND ACT, 2008 REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENER, THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KOTTAKKAL MUNICIPALITY, KOTTAKKAL P. O. , -2- WPC No. 40732 of 2023 MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. , PIN – 676503 SMT. DVI SHRI. R. GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05. 08. 2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -3- WPC No. 40732 of 2023 MOHAMMED NIAS C. P. , J. ----------------------------------------------- WP(C)No. 40732 of 2023 ---------------------------------------------th Dated this the 5 day of August, 2024 JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Form 5 application preferred by the petitioner was already been rejected. This is recorded. Nothing further remains to be considered in this writ petition. Accordingly, the same is closed as infructuous. Sd/- MOHAMMED NIAS C. P. JUDGE dlk/5. 8.

2024 -4- APPENDIX OF WP(C) 40732/2023 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION (IN FORM NUMBER 5) DATED 01. 11. 2019 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT. A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 03. 02. 2022 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT. A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 03. 02. 2023 IN W. P. (C) NO. 9393 OF 2022 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT. A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 11. 08. 2023 IN CONT. CASE. (CIVIL) NO. 979 OF 2023 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT. A TRUE COPY THE KSREC REPORT DATED 09. 10. 2023. A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 07. 11. 2023 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS ANNEXURES TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL ORDER ISSUED IN FORM 5 DATED 07-11-2023

Source: High Court of Kerala. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.