GAURI BAGHLA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: ARUN MONGA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2024-12-19. GAURI BAGHLA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2024:RJ-JD:53075] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 21458/2024 Gauri Baghla D/o Shri Jagdish Baghla, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 9, Adarsh Colony, Suratgarh, District Sri Ganganagar (Raj. ). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Joint Director, School Education, Bikaner Division, Bikaner. 3. The Joint Director, School Education, Jaipur Division, Jaipur. 4. Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Jaipur Division, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. H. R. Chawla For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA Order (Oral) 19/12/2024 1. Petitioner herein seeks directions to the respondents to give posting nearby her home town i. e. 14 B. B. Block Padampur, District Sri Ganganagar. 2.
At the outset, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has also filed a representation dated 07. 12. 2024 (Annex. 5) before the competent authority of the respondents for mitigation of her grievance, and the petitioner is sanguine that, in case her representation is taken up on the administrative side, it will receive favorable treatment. Therefore, [2024:RJ-JD:53075] (2 of 2) [CW-21458/2024] the same may be decided by the competent authority as per the applicable policy of transfer policy/notification within a reasonable time. 3. Without commenting on the merits of case, in view of the submission made, the competent authority of respondents is directed to decide the aforesaid pending representation filed by the petitioner objectively, as expeditiously as possible, as per the applicable transfer policy / guidelines of the State.
It would be appreciated of the Competent Authority if the extenuating circumstances, which have been enumerated in the petition herein, are gone into before passing the order and after verification, if found to be genuine, then appropriate order be passed. 4. It is made clear that the direction to consider the representation shall not be construed as an expression of any opinion, in any manner. 5. Disposed of accordingly. 6. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (ARUN MONGA),J 210-skm/-
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.