SARDAR RAM SAGAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2025-12-05. SARDAR RAM SAGAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
( 2025:JHHC:36963 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M. P. No. 3061 of 2025 ------ 1. Sardar Ram Sagar Singh, aged about 42 years, 2. Sardar Parsuram Singh @ Parshuram Singh, aged about 34 years, Both are sons of Late Sardar Gurumukh Singh, and residents of Village-Dumari Kala, P. O. -Hiring, P. S. -Hunterganj, District- Chatra, Jharkhand. … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Dhirendra Kr. Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, Addl. P. P. ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-05-12-2025 Heard the parties. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioners with the prayer for restoration of A. B. A No. 648 of 2025 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 29. 01. 2025. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that A. B. A No.
648 of 2025 stood dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 29. 01. 2025 for filing the supplementary affidavit within three weeks. It is next submitted that due to some unavoidable circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioners could not file the said supplementary affidavit within the stipulated time; which resulted in dismissal of the said A. B. A No. 648 of 2025 for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 29. 01. 2025. It is next submitted that non-compliance of peremptory order dated 29. 01. 2025 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioners have very good grounds to agitate in the said A. B. A No. 648 of 2025 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioners will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the A. B. A No. 648 of 2025 be restored to its original file. Learned counsel appearing for the State has not raised any serious objection.
Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners and the facts of this case, A. B. A No. 648 of 2025 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal. Registry is directed to list A. B. A No. 648 of 2025 before the concerned Bench after a week. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J. ) 05/12/2025 Abhiraj/
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.