SMT ANITA TIWARI v. SAIF ALI MUSALMAN
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-01-23. SMT ANITA TIWARI v. SAIF ALI MUSALMAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR VANI rd ON THE 23 OF JANUARY, 2024 MISC. APPEAL No. 4095 of 2022 BETWEEN:- 1. SMT ANITA TIWARI W/O LATE SHRI ANIL TIWARI TRIPATHI, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCCUPATION: HOUSE WIFE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DUBEHI THANA DEHAT MAIHAR DISTRICT SATNA CURRENT ADDRESS UMARI SATNA THANA CIVIL LINES TAHSIL RAGHURAJ NAGAR DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. KU. DIVYANGI TIWARI D/O LATE SHRI ANIL TIWARI, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS, OCCUPATION: STUDENT R/O VILLAGE DUBEHI THANA DEHAT MAIHAR DISTRICT SATNA CURRENT ADDRESS UMARI SATNA THANA CIVIL LINES TAHSIL RAGHURAJ NAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. KU. SHIVANGI TIWARI D/O LATE SHRI ANIL TIWARI, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, OCCUPATION: STUDENT R/O VILLAGE DUBEHI THANA DEHAT MAIHAR DISTRICT SATNA CURRENT ADDRESS UMARI SATNA THANA CIVIL LINES TAHSIL RAGHURAJ NAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH) 4. RAMKRISHN TIWARI S/O LATE SHRI ANIL TIWARI, AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS, OCCUPATION: STUDENT MINOR THROUGH MOTHER SMT.
ANITA TIWARI R/O VILLAGE DUBEHI THANA DEHAT MAIHAR DISTRICT SATNA CURRENT ADDRESS UMARI SATNA THANA CIVIL LINES TAHSIL RAGHURAJ NAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... APPELLANTS (NONE) AND 1. SAIF ALI MUSALMAN S/O SHRI SAHJAD ALI, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DABHORA DISTRICT REWA (MADHYA PRADESH) Signature Not Verified Signed by: AKANKSHA Signing time: 30-01-2024 18:12:58 2. KU. POOJA MISHRA D/O ARVIND DATT MISHRA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, MIG 3/3/49 NEHRUNAGAR REWA THANA SAMAN DISTRICT REWA (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. NEW INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED THROUGH DIVISIONAL MANAGER DIVISIONAL OFFICE NEAR PARIJAT HOTEL REWA ROAD SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH) 4. SHRI RAJENDRA PRASAD TIWARI S/O LATE SHRI MANGALDEEN TIWARI R/O VILLAGE POST DUBEHI TEHSIL MAIHAR DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... RESPONDENTS (NONE ) This appeal coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the following: ORDER None appeared for the appellant even in the pass over round.
It appears that appellant has lost interest in prosecuting this appeal. Hence, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. (RAJENDRA KUMAR VANI) JUDGE Akm Signature Not Verified Signed by: AKANKSHA Signing time: 30-01-2024 18:12:58
Source: High Court of Madhya Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.