THE COMMISSIONER OF IT IV v. M/S. OCEAN SPARKLES LIMITED
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: J SREENIVAS RAO,ALOK ARADHE
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-12-20. THE COMMISSIONER OF IT IV v. M/S. OCEAN SPARKLES LIMITED. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY ,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 86 OF 2013 (lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260 A of the lncome Tax Act , against the order made in LT. A. No. 523/H/10, Dated 25. 01. 2012 on the file lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench "8", Hyderabad Assessment Year 2005-06, preferred against the order made in l. T. A. No. 091/DCIT 16(3)/C|T(A)-V t2OOg-10 Dated 14. 10. 2010 on the file of the commissioner Tar, (Appeals)-V, Hyderabad preferred against the Order made in No. AAACO2519H, Dated 22. 09. 2009 on the file of Deputy commissioner of Tax, Circle-16(3), Hyderabad. ) Between: The Commissioner of lncome Tax lV, Hyderabad. ... A''ELLANT AND [/lis. Ocean Sparkles Limited, 1st Floor, 128 Srinagar Colony, Hyderab-1d. -^.. ^ ...
RESPONDENT Gounsel for the Appellant : SRl. J. V. PRASAD (sc FoR rNcoME TAX) Counsel for the Respondent : SRI ROHAN ALOOR REP. SRI CH. PUSHYAM KIRAN The Court made the following: ORDER THE HqN'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO INCOME TA)( TRIBUNAL APPEAL No. 86 of 2013 JUDGMENT: Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Alok Aradhe) Mr. J. V. Prasad, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department for tl-re appellant. Mr. Rohan Aloor, learned counsel representing Mr. Ch. pushyam Kiran, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. Learnr:d Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant seeks leave of this court to withdraw the appear in the light of the circular No. o9 12024, date:d 17. 09. 2024, wrtj, the liberty to revive the same in case the subject matter of the appeal falls in aly of the exceptions provided in the Circular No. 5/2024 d,ated 15. O3. 2024. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the liberty as prayed for.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. *sd/:x. IiRt NIVASA RAO JOINT R EG,ISTRAR //TRUE COPY// j SECTI ON OFFICER To, I The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad . 8. ,, \ Bench 2 rne L;ommissiorer Hyderabad jt of rncome Trr. "nil! ,rroro il ioo*"[i_V A " "' "" 6 EEli:i,i,fr*;;:"#ry,J;:iiljrJ! Fi \ Ks/ ff w HIGH COURT DATED:2011212024 eoF Ir-r tr1 JUDGMENT e $t o ) \\\ t ITTA. No. 86 of 2013 F. $ tr lH+ I l i i I I DISMISSING l THE APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS. il*t t
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.