GOVIND KUMAR GAUTAM @ CHIGGUL v. State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad High Court
Bench: AJIT SINGH
Judgment date:
Case summary
Allahabad High Court judgment dated 2020-12-09. GOVIND KUMAR GAUTAM @ CHIGGUL v. State of U.P. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Court No. - 76 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 41352 of 2020 Applicant :- Govind Kumar Gautam @ Chiggul Opposite Party :- State of U. P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Sarwar Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G. A. Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A. G. A. This is a bail application on behalf of the applicant Govind Kumar Gautam alias Chiggul in connection with Case Crime No. 65/20, under Sections 366, 376-D, 468 I. P. C. , Police Station Jalalpur, district Jaunpur. The first information report of this incident was lodged by the complainant against seven accused persons including the applicant through an application moved under Section 156 (3) Cr. P. C. The police submitted the charge sheet only against the applicant. The submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is quite innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with the ulterior motive.
He submitted that the alleged victim was major and she had gone with the applicant out of her own sweet will and she had lived with the applicant at various places but she has not raised any alarm anywhere to save herself. He submitted that the alleged victim has solemnized marriage with the applicant, copy of the marriage certificate has been annexed on page no. 55 of the paper book. He further submitted that medical does not support the allegation of rape. He submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 13. 06. 2020 and in case, he is released on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial. Learned A. G. A. has opposed the bail plea. Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations, the gravity of offence, the severity of the punishment, the evidence appearing against the accused, but without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail.
Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed. Let the applicant Govind Kumar Gautam alias Chiggul involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence. ii) The applicant shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses; iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court; iv) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission; v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad, self attested by learned counsel for the applicant along with a self attested identity proof of the said persons (preferably Aadhar Card) mentioning the mobile number (s) to which the said Aadhar Card is linked before the concerned Court/Authority/Official. The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing. Order Date :- 9. 12. 2020 R. /
Source: Allahabad High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.