GARG GRAMIN WARE HOUSE v. CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: AVNEESH JHINGAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2024-12-12. GARG GRAMIN WARE HOUSE v. CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2024:RJ-JP:51125] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3506/2020 Garg Gramin Ware House, A Partnership Firm, Mui Ka Pyau, Kushtala, Kota- Sawai Madhopur Megha Highway, Sawai Madhopur (Raj. ) Through Its Partner Shri Satya Narayan Gupta S/o Late Shri Ramlal Gupta, Age About 56 Years, R/o Link Road, Infront Of New Grain Mandi, Mahaveer Nagar, Sawai Madhopur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Chief General Manager, National Bank For Agricultural And Rural Development, C-24, G-Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra East, Mumbai. 2. Assistant General Manager, National Bank For Agricultural And Rural Development, Rajasthan Regional Office, 3, Nehru Place, Tonk Road, Jaipur (Raj. ) 3. Secretary, Ministry Of Agriculture And Farmers Welfare, Government Of India, New Delhi. 4. Joint Secretary-Cum-Agriculture Marketing Advisor, Government Of India, New Delhi. 5. Joint Agriculture Marketing Advisor, Directorate Of Marketing And Inspection, Faridabad. 6.
Assistant Marketing Advisor, Ministry Of Agriculture And Farmers Welfare, Directorate Of Marketing And Inspection (Dmi), Regional Office, Block-1, 4Th Floor, Kendriya Sadar Parishad, Sector-10, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur. 7. The Regional Manager, Corporation Bank, Rajasthan Vihar Colony, Adinath Nagar, Sawai Madhopur. 8. The Branch Manager, Corporation Bank, Plot No. 15, 16, 17, 45 And 46, First Floor, Mahaveer Nagar, New Grain Mandi Road, Sawai Madhopur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chinmay Saxena for Mr. Jag Mohan Saxena For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave Mr. VS Badaya Mr. Ram Naresh Vijay Mr. Anmol Dhakad Mr. Adeet Srivastava for Mr. Sanjay Srivastava HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Order [2024:RJ-JP:51125] (2 of 2) [CW-3506/2020] 12/12/2024 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent developments during pendency of the writ petition, no cause of action survives for pursuing the petition.
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as rendered infructuous. (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Chandan/Riya/69
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.