Mohammed Ishaq Ahmed v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-18. Mohammed Ishaq Ahmed v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[ 31831 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) . THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO:38951 OF 2025 Between: 1. Mohammed lshaq Ahmed, S/o. khaja Moinuddin, aged about 22 years, Occ Business, Rl/o. 10-176/15, New Gayatri Homes, Jillelaguda Village, Balapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 500 097. 2. Modala Anjaneyulu, S/o. M. Sathyanarayana, aged about 51 years, Occ Business, R/o. 8-5-10/15, . Teachers Colony, Electricity Tower, Mahaboob Nagar - 509 001 ... PETITIONERS AND 1. The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Munlcipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Deputy Commissioner, GHMC, Chanda Nagar Circle-21, Rama Reddy District. 3. The Assistant City Planner, Chanda Nagar Ctcle-21, Rang Reddy District. 4. The Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 5.
The Revenue lnspector, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ... RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances siated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any Writ, Order or any direction more particularly in the nature a bf Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent nos. 2 to 5 in interfering with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment including construction activity in respect of part of Plot No. 37, admeasuring 175 Sq. Yards situated in survey no. 41111 of Khanamet Village, Serilingampally Mandal, under G. H. M. C, Ranga Reddy District without following due process of law as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article-3O0A of Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondent nos. 2 to 5 not to interfere with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment including construction activity in respect of part of Plot No. 37, admeasuring 175 Sq.
Yards situated in survey no. 41111 of Khanamet Village, Serilingampally Mandal, under G. H. M. C, Ranga Reddy District without following due process of law lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent nos. 2 to 5 not to interfere with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment including construction activity in respect of part of Plot No. 37, admeasuring 175 sq. Yards situated in survey no. 41111 of Khanamet Village, Serilingampally Mandal, under G. H. M. C, Ranga Reddy District without following due process of law forthwith pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI S. SRIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No. 2 & 3: SRt G. MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, SC FOR GHMC Counselfor the Respondent No.
4 & 5: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER I IN THE HIGH COI'RT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY DATE OF ORDER: 18. 12. 2025 Between: Mohammed Ishaq Ahmed and another ... Petitioners AND The State of Telangana Represented by its Principal Secretary Municipal Administration & Urban Development Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad and four others ... Respondents ORDER: (ORAL) This writ petition is filed by the petitioners seeking to declare the action of respondents No. 2 to 5 in interfering with their possession and enjoyment including construction activity in respect of the land admeasuri ng 17 5 square yards in Plot No. 37 in Survey No-4 1/ I 1, situated at Khanamet Vitlage, Serilingampatly Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without following due process of law, as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional. *a* r- -\: 2. Heard Mr. S. Sridhar, learned counsel for the petitioners; Mr. G.
Madhusudan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for GHMC, appearing for respondents No. 2 and 3; and perused the material on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners relied on the order passed by this Court in W. P. No. 31,,976 of 2025 dated 14. 11. 2025 wherein in similar circumstances, the respondent authorities were directed not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioners therein in respect of the structures raised by them in the subject property and requested this Court that the same order may be passed. 4. In the circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent authorities not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioners in respect of the structures raised by them in the subject property admeasuring 175 square yards in Plot No. 37 in Survey No. 4ll11, situated at Khanamet Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without following due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. ! I t .
: J As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition, stand closed. n SD/-A. SREEN REDDY ASSISTANT //TRUE COPY// S R To, Adminis-tration and Urban Development 1. , ' The Principal SecretahT,. Municipal State of Telangana. Oti"rt,iilirii, SJ. i"tiiiai,'Hydera6ad, Circle-21, Rama Reddy GHMC, Chanda Nagar 2. The Deputy Commissioner, District. planner, chanda Nagar circle-21, Rang Reddy District' 3. The Assistant city Reddy District' 4. The Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal' Ranga 5. TheRevenuelnspector,serilingampallyMandal,RangaReddyDistrict. 6. One CC to SRt S. SRIDHAR, Advocate [OPUC] T. oneCCtoSRtG. MADHUSUDHANREDDY,ScFoRGHMC[oPUC] court g. URBAN DEV, High for the State of Two ccs to GP FOR MCPL ADMN -' Tetangana at HYderabad TOUTI the State of relangana at g. High court for Two ccs to Gp FOR REVENUE, Hyderabad IOUTI 10. Two CD CoPies BSR BS My HIGH COURT DATED:1811212025 is ;--irtE r'. ORDER ii, i I 0 [,te ;Ii WP. No. 38951 ot 2025 . ,i' .
'/ * [)E s;,,,.. ;r:r \';--' .. i/ DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS b ?
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.