AYUSH v. HIMACHAL PRADESH BOARD OF SCHOOL EDUCATION
Court: High Court of Himachal Pradesh
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN,HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTSNA REWAL DUA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Himachal Pradesh judgment dated 2020-12-31. AYUSH v. HIMACHAL PRADESH BOARD OF SCHOOL EDUCATION. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 6388 of 2020 st Decided on: 31 December, 2020 ____________________________________________________________ Ayush ….. Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh Board of School Education ….. Respondent _____________________________________________________________ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge The Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge 1 Whether approved for reporting? ______________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Dinesh K. Thakur, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Vir Bahadur Verma, Advocate. (Through Video Conferencing) Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral) The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for the grant of following substantive reliefs:- “i) A Writ in the nature of Mandamus may be issued to the respondent regarding declaration of +2 examination result, in which petitioner appeared from dated 4. 03. 2020 to 21. 03. 2020 against issued roll no.
2090465011. ii) That the respondent may be directed in case of delayed declaring result of petitioner for march, 2020, the respondent may not take any extra late fees for +2 exams in case of failure of result to apply further for March 2021 examination. ” Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - 2. Admittedly, the petitioner has passed his matriculation examination in August, 2018 (24. 08. 2018), as per Annexure P/1, from “Grameen Mukt Vidhyalayi Shikshan Sansthan”. The only hurdle in not declaring the result of the petitioner is on account of non-recognition of Grameen Mukt Vidhyalayi Shikshan Sansthan with the Himachal Pradesh Board of School Education, i. e. the respondent herein. 3. However, similar issue came up before this Court in CWP No. 849 of 2019, titled Priyanka Devi vs. State of H. P. and others, decided on 10. 09. 2019, wherein learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.
2-Board had placed on record written instructions, which revealed that during the period from 01. 12. 2017 to 05. 02. 2019, “Grameen Mukt Vidhyalayi Shikshan Sansthan”, i. e. respondent No. 3, was duly recognized with the Himachal Pradesh Board of School Education, i. e. respondent No. 2. 4. Therefore, once the petitioner has appeared for matriculation examination during the period when Grameen Mukt Vidhyalayi Shikshan Sansthan was recognized by the respondent, the petitioner was rightly admitted in 10+2 - 3 -examination by the respondent. 5. Therefore, in such circumstances, there is no impediment in not declaring the result of the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is allowed and the respondent is directed to declare the result of the petitioner for 10+2 examination, within a period of two weeks from today. 7. The instant writ petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms, so also the pending application(s), if any. Copy dasti.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge (Jyotsna Rewal Dua) December 31, 2020 Judge (Mukesh)
Source: High Court of Himachal Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.