Skip to main content
LawSphereX

RAMESH KUMAR CHAUBEY v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Court: High Court of Chhattisgarh

Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE P. SAM KOSHY

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Chhattisgarh judgment dated 2020-10-27. RAMESH KUMAR CHAUBEY v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC NO. 2233 OF 2020 Ramesh Kumar Chaubey, S/o Late Murlidhar Chaubey, aged about 59 years, R/o Village & Tahsil Gharghoda, District Raigarh (CG) … Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (CG) 2. Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh (CG) 3. Tahsildar, Gharghoda, Tahsil Gharghoda, District Raigarh (CG) … Respondent(s) _______________________________________________________________ For Petitioner : Mr. S. P. Sahu, Advocate, under instructions of Mr. Manish Upadhyay, Advocate. For Respondent-State : Mr. Anand Verma, Dy. A. G. _______________________________________________________________ Hon'ble Mr. Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 27. 10. 2020 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking for an appropriate direction to Respondent No. 2 to decide the representation dated 13. 8.

2020 (Annexure P-1) filed by the Petitioner. 2. A plain reading of Annexure P-1 would show that it is nothing but an information sought from the office of the District Collector, Raigarh district. It is not in respect of any decision which the Respondents are to take. 3. This Court is of the opinion that for the said relief the present writ petition is not maintainable. If the Petitioner wants certain information from the office of the District Collector, Raigarh, which he has not been otherwise provided, he has every right to approach the authority under the provisions of the Right to Information Act and obtain the same. Writ jurisdiction cannot be converted or extended for getting informations not being provided by the State authorities. 4. Reserving the right of the Petitioner to approach the authorities under the provisions of the Right to Information Act, the present writ petition at this juncture is disposed of. 5. Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (P.

Sam Koshy) /sharad/ Judge

Source: High Court of Chhattisgarh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.