SMT. LAKSHAMI v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-01-17. SMT. LAKSHAMI v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANAND PATHAK th ON THE 17 OF JANUARY, 2024 WRIT PETITION No. 538 of 2024 BETWEEN:- 1. SMT. LAKSHAMI D/O LATE SHRI RAMSHANKAR W/O SHRI SHIV SINGH, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, OCCUPATION: PRIVATE JOB PERMANENT R/O RUKANPUR KURSAINA JASWANT NAGAR ETAWAH UP CURRENT R/O WARD NO 3 GORMI DISTRICT BHIND (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. SHIV SINGH S/O SHRI RAMARATAN SINGH, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, OCCUPATION: PRIVATE JOB RUKANPUR, KURSAINA ETAWAH, JAWANT NAGAR U. P. CURRENT RESIDENT WARD NO. 3 GORMI DIST. BHIND (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... PETITIONER (BY SHRI AKARAM KHAN- ADVOCATE) AND 1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY VALLABH BHAWAN, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE DISTRICT MAINPURI (UTTAR PRADESH) 3. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE DISTRICT MAINPURI (UTTAR PRADESH) 4. STATION HOUSE OFFICER POLICE STATION GORMI DIST. BHIND (MADHYA PRADESH) 5.
RADHESHYAM PRAJAPATI S/O SHRI LATE SHRI RAMDULARE PRAJAPATI SHAHEEDABAD, DIST. MAINPURI (UTTAR PRADESH) 6. PANCHAM SINGH S/O SHRI RADHESHYAM SHAHEEDABAD, DIST. MAINPURI (UTTAR PRADESH) Signature Not Verified Signed by: VISHAL Signing time: 17-01-2024 06:18:01 PM ..... RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI VIVEK KHEDKAR- GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENTS NO. 1 TO 4. ) This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the following: ORDER 1. The instant petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking protection as both the parties, as submitted, have entered into wedlock. 2. On perusal of the cause title and other documents annexed with the petition, it appears that petitioners are residents of Etawa (Uttar Pradesh) and after solemnization of marriage, they represented themselves as residents of Gormi District Bhind (M. P. ) and are seeking protection before this Court. 3.
However, on close scrutiny, it appears that appropriate jurisdiction of seeking relief as prayed in the petition lies somewhere else. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for petitioner seeks withdrawal of this petition seeking liberty to pursue his other remedies before Allahabad High Court in accordance with law. 5. Prayer noted. 6. Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. (ANAND PATHAK) JUDGE Vishal Signature Not Verified Signed by: VISHAL Signing time: 17-01-2024 06:18:01 PM
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.