Skip to main content
LawSphereX

I.VASANTHA KUMAR v. UNION OF INDIA

Court: Madras High Court

Bench: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

Judgment date:

Case summary

Madras High Court judgment dated 2024-12-18. I.VASANTHA KUMAR v. UNION OF INDIA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

W. P. No. 14834 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 18. 12. 2024 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND W. P. No. 14834 of 2013 I. Vasantha Kumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1. Union of India, Rep. , by its Secretary to Government, Education Department, Government of Union Territory of Puducherry, Puducherry. 2. The Director of School Education, Puducherry. 3. The Correspondent, Societe Progressiste High School, No. 12, Kalathiswaran Koil Street, Puducherry – 605 001. 4. A. S. N. Saraswati Kumari, Physical Education Teacher, Sudhana Nagar, Nainarmandapam, Puducherry – 605 004. ... Respondents Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records on the file of the second respondent relating to the impugned order bearing Ref. No. 2893/DSE/GIAS/U. III/2012-13 dated 09. 05.

2013 and quash the same in as much as it relates to the redeployment of the fourth respondent to the third respondent https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis 1/4 W. P. No. 14834 of 2013 institution and consequently pass orders as to the grant of approval to the proposal of the third respondent dated 06. 10. 2010 and approve the appointment of the petitioner as Physical Education Teacher and pay all the arrears of salary with interests from 06. 10. 2010. For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr. R. Syed Mustafa, for RR1 & 2 Special Government Pleader Mr. P. Suresh, for R3 No Appearance for R4 O R D E R There was no representation for the petitioner on 20. 11. 2024 and accordingly, it was posted to 27. 11. 2024 and on 27. 11. 2024 also there was no representation for the petitioner and accordingly, it was posted 'for dismissal' today. Today also there is no representation for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner has no interest to prosecute the case. 2.

On the other hand, Mr. R. Syed Mustafa, learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents 1 and 2 and Mr. P. Suresh, learned counsel for the third respondent submits that the petitioner left third respondent-School long back and now working in PM Shree Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Yanam, as Physical Education Teacher. https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis 2/4 W. P. No. 14834 of 2013 3. In view of the above factual position, it appears that the petitioner has no interest to prosecute the case. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. 5. There shall be no order as to costs. 18. 12. 2024 Index :Yes/No Neutral Citation :Yes/No AT To 1. The Secretary to Government, Union of India, Education Department, Government of Union Territory of Puducherry, Puducherry. 2. The Director of School Education, Puducherry. https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis 3/4 W. P. No. 14834 of 2013 BATTU DEVANAND, J. AT W. P. No. 14834 of 2013 18. 12. 2024 https://www. mhc. tn. gov.

in/judis 4/4

Source: Madras High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.