Ramavath Ramesh v. The High Court of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: J SREENIVAS RAO
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-17. Ramavath Ramesh v. The High Court of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[ 3303 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY,TIIE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 16831 OF 2025 Between: 1 Ramavath Ramesh, S/o. Late Sakriya Naik, Aged about 43 years, Occ Govt. Employee, R/o. H. No. S-35Gemyanayak Thanda Village, Peddavoora Mandal, Nalgonda District 2 Ramavath Ambi, Wo. Late Sakriya Naik, Aged about 62 Years, Occ Housewife, R/o. H. No. 5-3SGemyanayak Th-anda Village, Peddavoora Mandal, Nalgonda District. ... Petitioner/Respondents No. 1 & 2 AND 1 The High Court of Telangana, Judicature at Hyderabad, Rep. by its public Prosecutor. ... Respondent No. 1 2. Ramavath Swathi, Wo. Ramesh, Aged about 34 Years, Occ Housewife, R:/o. H. No. 18-'1374, Ashoknagar, Miryalguda, Nalgonda District. ... Respondent No.
2/Aggrieved Party Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the Proceedings in D. V. C. No. 2212024 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate Miryalguda for the offences under Section 18 to 20 of Domestic Violence Act. l. A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further Proceedings in D. V. C. No. 22 12024 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate Miryalguda for the 20 0f Domestic re Viorence Act pending to disposar ffi""tion "i*""ffi, This petition comi on for hearing' upon perusing 'l e Grounds Memorandum of criminar r"r,nn of upon hearing thr "no BHASKAR, Advocate ,or'"on :;ff:l']'H:'Jffn: Addrona pub prosecj:: c ::TI"j;: li espondett appeared for No"l, and the Respondent none No2.
The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGAI,IA ATITYDERABAD THE HONOTIRABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No. 1683l of2025 Date:17. 12. 2025 Between: Ramavath Ramesh and another Petitioners ANI) The High Court ofTelangana Judicature at Hydcrabad Rep by its Public Prosecutor Hyderabad and another Respondents ORDER This Criminal Petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings against the petitioners in DVC No. 22 of 2024, on the fite of learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, Miryalaguda 2. Heard Mr. Rapolu Abhinav, learned counsel representing Mr. Rapolu Bhaskar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Jithendar Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No. I . 3. Leamed counsel lor the petitioners vehcmently contended that respondent No. 2 has not lived along with petitioner Nos. I and 2 and that there has been no domestic relationship for the last eight years Hence, Respondent No.
2 is not entitled to any rclief as clairned in s made of 2024. Upon perusal of the avermert in DVC DVC No. 22 Respondent No 2 has made spe :ihc allegations No. 22 of 2024, Nos'l and 2 and has sough' various reliefs. against Petitioner No. 2 is entitled to the reliefs cl imed in the said Whether Respondent adjudicated and decided by the leamer Magistrate after case has to be the learn: trial. The grounds raised by I counsel for the a full-fledged questions of fact' and tht: same cannot be petitioners are disputed in the present criminal petition' Hcrr' c, thcre are no adjudicated petitio I quash the proceedings irgainst the )fs. grounds to ' taking into consideration thc age ) Pctitioner No. 2 4. I{or. vever, Petitioner No' I who ir a govemment occupation of , and the before the the presence of Petitioners lear red Judicial First employee, Miryalaguda, in DVC No.
22 of 2 )24 is dispensed Class Magistrate, presence is spccifically required r uring the course their with, unless tioners shall be of the trial, subject to the condition that the pt:l date heari'r In the event of by their counsel on every of 1. represented y the triai Court, of petitioners on any date so fixed t non-appearance entitled to proceed w:l r the rnatter in the triat Court shall be accordance with law' the criminal petition is disposctl :rf 5 Accordingly, r Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed SD/- B. REKHA RANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,,. /q //TRUE COPYII SECTION OFFICER \ To, 1. The Principal Judicial First Class Magistrate at Miryalaguda. 2. The Station House Officer, Miryalaguda Il Town Police Station, Nalgonda District. 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] 4. One CC to SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies W NVB l l HIGH COURT DATED:1711212025 J d <ffii /. 1,' lt..
il - 2 I 0[i tirl \1. . l . 9' ,' . " z), ; . iP. nTrt't . _ -:: _- ORDER CRLP. No. 16831 of 2025 DISPOSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION .. I v
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.