DEVKINAND MISHRA v. STATE OF M.P.
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-01-08. DEVKINAND MISHRA v. STATE OF M.P. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANAND PATHAK th ON THE 8 OF JANUARY, 2024 WRIT PETITION No. 3875 of 2006 BETWEEN:- DEVKINAND MISHRA S/O SHRI PATI RAM MISHRA , AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCCUPATION:NIL R/O VILLAGE TUDILA, TEH. JAURA, DISTT. MORENA (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... PETITIONER (BY SHRI KARAN VIRWANI - ADVOCATE ON BEHALF OF MS. SOMYA CHATURVEDI - ADVOCATE ) AND 1. STATE OF M. P. DEPTT. OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, VALLABH BHAWAN, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF PUBLICINSTRUCTIONS MADHYA PRADESH G A U T A M OCCUPATION: NAGAR BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. ZILA PANCHAYAT MORENA TH. THE COLLECTOR DISTT. M ORENA OCCUPATION: DISTT. MORENA (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI VIVEK KHEDKAR - AAG AND SHRI M. S. JADON - G. A. FOR RESPONDENTS/STATE This petition coming on for hearing this day, th e court passed the following: ORDER 1.
The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is preferred by the petitioner seeking following reliefs:- "a) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction in the nature of writ under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and -i) Direct the respondents to absorb the petitioner in Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission/ Shiksha Gurantee Scheme. b. Issue any other writ order or direction in the nature of writ under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as this Hon'ble court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case. c. Cost of the petitioner may also be allowed. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for respondents submits that it appears that purpose of filing the petition is over because the petition is pending since 2006 and petitioner sought absorption in Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission/Shiksha Gurantee Scheme. According to Shri Khedkar the said scheme has come to an end already. 3.
Considering the submissions, petition stands dismissed as rendered infructuous. However, if any right subsists then petitioner may file fresh petition, if situation warrants so. (ANAND PATHAK) JUDGE Van VANDANA VERMA 2024. 01. 09 18:34:26 +05'30'
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.