ADWAIT KUMAR PATTNAIK v. STATE OF ODISHA
Court: High Court of Orissa
Bench: MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Orissa judgment dated 2026-04-10. ADWAIT KUMAR PATTNAIK v. STATE OF ODISHA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W. P. (C) No. 5312 of 2026 Adwait Kumar Pattnaik …. Petitioner Mr. P. C. Mahapatra, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA COROM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 10. 04. 2026 This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. Heard learned counsel for appearing for the Parties. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, prayed that your Lordships be graciously pleased to admit the writ petition, issue rule nisi in the nature of appropriate writ or any other writ (s) as deem fit and proper calling upon the Opp. Parties to show cause as to why the prayer made hereunder shall not be allowed, and if no/ insufficient cause is shown, the said rule be made absolute by issuing writ(s) in the nature of:- The Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to quash the impugned letter No. 5129, dated 10. 03. 2021 passed by the O. P. No.
1 along with the contents therein available at Annexure-10 (Series) and to direct not to consider the same as an impediment to release any service benefit to the petitioner in the interest of justice. AND, Further be pleased to pass such other writ (s)/ order (s) as may deem just and proper, AND, For this act of kindness, the petitioner, as in, duty bound shall ever pray. ”. 4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner // 2 // states that highlighting her grievance, Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No. 1 vide Annexure-12 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection. 5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.
1 to consider the representation filed by the Petitioner vide Annexure-12 within a period of three (3) months in accordance with law from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Subrat
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.