SHYAM LAL SAO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2026-04-29. SHYAM LAL SAO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 459 of 2021 ------ 1. Shyam Lal Sao, son of late Shiv Sao, present resident of Village Patratu, P. O. Kaima, P. S. & District Latehar. 2. Satendra Sao, son of Bishun Sao, present resident of Village Patratu, P. O. Kaima, P. S. & District Latehar. 3. Harihar Sao, son of late Kesho Sao, present resident of Village Patratu, P. O. Kaima, P. S. & District Latehar. 4. Madan Sao, son of late Lalo Sao, present resident of Village Patratu, P. O. Kaima, P. S. & District Latehar, Jharkhand. 5. Laxman Sao, son of late Keso Sao, present resident of Village Patratu, P. O. Kaima, P. S. & District Latehar, Jharkhand. … … Petitioners Versus 1. State of Jharkhand. 2. The Secretary, Land Reforms and Revenue Department, Government of Jharkhand, at & P. O. + P. S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 3. The Secretary, Department of Welfare, Government of Jharkhand, at & P. O. + P. S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 4.
The Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Jharkhand, at & P. O. + P. S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 5. The Deputy Commissioner, Latehar, P. O. & P. S. and District Latehar, Jharkhand. 6. The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Latehar, P. O. & P. S. and District Latehar, Jharkhand. 7. The Deputy Collector, Revenue and Land Reforms, Latehar, P. O. & P. S. and District Latehar, Jharkhand. 8. The Circle Officer, Latehar, P. O. & P. S. and District Latehar, Jharkhand. … … Respondents ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jageshwar Mahto, Advocate For the Respondent(s): Mr. Pradeep Kumar, AC to AAG-IV ------ 14/ 29. 04. 2026 Learned counsel representing the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition to approach the District Judge, Latehar, where the State has already preferred an Appeal against the order passed under Section 87 of the Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act. 2. Permission is granted. 3.
The liberty is granted to the petitioners to contest the said Appeal. It will be open to the petitioners to approach the appropriate Forum, if necessary. 4. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty. (ANANDA SEN, J. ) th 29 April, 2026 Prashant. Cp-2 Uploaded on 12. 05. 2026
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.