MOHAN v. STATE
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2020-12-08. MOHAN v. STATE. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13787/2020 1. Mohan S/o Shri Badia, Aged 40 Years, R/o Saatsahelia, Police Station Salamgarh, District Pratapgarh. (At Present Lodged In District Jail Pratapgarh). 2. Shyamlal S/o Shri Rooplal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Chikli, Police Station Salamgarh, District Pratapgarh. (At Present Lodged In District Jail Pratapgarh). 3. Laxman S/o Badru, Aged 30 Years, R/o Chikli Police Station Salamgarh, District Pratapgarh. (At Present Lodged In District Jail Pratapgarh). ----Petitioners Versus State of Raj. , Through P. P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ramesh Chandra Purohit through VC For Respondent(s) : Mr. Laxman Solanki, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA Judgment / Order 08/12/2020 The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr. P. C. on behalf of the petitioners, who are in judicial custody in connection with F. I. R. No.
68/2018, Police Station Salamgarh, District Pratapgarh, registered for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 307, 336, 332, 353, 427, 395 of IPC and Section 3 of PDPP Act. Heard and considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner appearing through video conferencing and learned Public Prosecutor present in person. Perused the material available on record. Learned counsel for the petitioners appearing through video calling stated that name of accused-petitioners not mentioned in the FIR and accused-petitioners whose names are mentioned in the F. I. R. have already been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13787/2020] of this Court; With these submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioners. Learned Public Prosecutor does not controvert the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly to the fact that the benefit of bail has already been granted to the co-accused persons by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court, whose names are mentioned in the FIR, i. e. Shyam Lal, Poonam Chand, Prabhu Lal (Bail Application No. 3741/2020 and 3742/2020) vide order dated 16. 04. 2020, and Ramesh, Praveen, Santosh, Ramlal, Devi Lal, Badri Lal, Poonam Chand, Laxman, Devi Lal, Suraj Mal @ Suraj (Bail Application No. 14618/2019) vide order dated 16. 12. 2019, and that the trial will take time. as mentioned above and the trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioners deserves to be accepted. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioners No. 1. - Mohan S/o Shri Badia, 2. Shyamlal S/o Shri Rooplal, 3.
Laxman S/o Badru, arrested in connection with F. I. R. No. 68/2018, Police Station Salamgarh, District Pratapgarh, shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA),J 43-amit/-
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.