Bhavanam Varalakshmi v. State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K. SARATH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-03. Bhavanam Varalakshmi v. State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[ 33021 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH tWRIT PETITION NO: 5159 OF 2022 Between: I Bhhvanam Varalakshmi Wo. Bhavanam Subba Reddy, Aged 54 years, Occ. Employee, R/o H. No. 5-3-422, Sri Krishna Nagar, Near VSK High School, Kukatpally, Hyd-72. ... PETITIONER nr,Jo i1. State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, T. S. Secretariat, Hyderabad. i I '. 2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. ,3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajendra Nagar Division, RR District. 4. The Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ...
RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of lvlandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No. 3, 4 and i thdir sub-ordinates in interfering and trying to remove the fencing stones in respect I of his Plot No. 496, admeasuring 300 Sq. yds in Sy. No. 36/24, situated at Phase ll, Vinayak Nagar Colony, Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and threatening to dispossess the petitioner from her plot without issuing any notice or without following due process of law, is illegal, arbitrary, violative or Art cle 14,21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the Respondent No. 3,4 and their sub-ordinates not to interfere rr tth the possession of thd petitioner in respect of her Plot No. 496, admeasuring 30() Sq.
yds, comprised in i SylNo. 36/24, situated at Phase ll, Vinayak Nagar Colon1,, Gopanpally Village, I Seiilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without follt ving due process of i law and without issuing notice. I I I ! A NO: 1 OF 2022 i Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ci. , umstances stated I in thd affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court mzr, be pleased to direct Respondent No. 3 and 4 and their sub-ordinates not 1r interfere with the possession of the Petitioner in respect j, of her Plot No. 4I admeasuring 300 I Sqlyds. comprised in Sy. No. 36/24, situated at Phase Il, V r ayak Nagar Colony, I GJpanpally Village, Serilingampatty tr/andat, Ranga Rel jy District, without I following due process of law and without issuing any notice.
I I Colunsel for the Petitioner: SRI ESLAVATH RAJU I I Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITIONNo. SIS 9 of 2022 Date: O3'a December 2O25 Between: Bhavanam Varaiakshmi ... Petitioner AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad & three others. ... Respondents ORDER: Heard Sri Eslavath Raju, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents ald perused the material on record 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner filed the present writ Petition seeking to declare the action of respondent Nos. 3 and 4 and their sub-ordinates in interfering with and attempting to remove the lencing stones in respect of petitioner's Plot No. 496, admeasuring 300 Sq. yards in Sy. wo.
j 6/24, situated, at Phase II, Vinayak Nagar Colony, GopanpaJly Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and threatening to dispossess the petitioner from her plot, without issuing any n ( tice and without following due process of law, as illegal and arbitrary, 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further sir Lbmits that while admitting the matter, this Court passed int:'im order dated 07. 02. 2022 with a direction to maintain statu-s quo r xisting as on that date until the next date of hearing in respect of the subject property. However, 1n spite of lapse of more than three ar d half vears, the respondent authorities did not file a counter or a vacate petition denying the averments made by the petitioner in tL r writ affidavit.
In view of the sarne, learned counsel requested this ( ourt to allow the Writ Petition by directing the respondent authorit r s not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in respect to th: subject property without foliowing due process of law. 4. On the other hand, learned Assistant Goverr ment Pleader for Revenue submits that if the petitioner is. in possess ion of the subject property, the respondents will not interfere rvlt I the petitioner's possession of the subject property, without follor,v I . g due process of law ald requested this Court to pass appropriate or,l :rs 5. In view of the submissions made on either sidr: this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondent authorities r ( t to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in Plot No. 496, r. dmeasuring 300 Sq. yards in Sy. No. 36/24, situated at Phase II, Vine'ak Nagar Colony, Gopanpally Village, Serilingampalty Maldal, Ranga Reddy District, without foilowing due procedure of law.
There shall be no order as to costs 6. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed. SD/. M. OSMAN ALI BAIG ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPYII CTION OFFICER To '1 . The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, e of Telangana, T. S. Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajendra Nagar Division, R. R. District. 4. The Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 5. One CC to SRI ESLAVATH RAJU, Advocate [OPUC] \ 6. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] 7. Two CD Copies M t HIGH COURT DA'l'ED:0311212025 ir:: ! , . , i. ' . ',+. J () L l. ,, 0t '1 't- ,2 t"'/t \r ORDER WP. l,lr. 5159 of 2022 . DISPOSING OF THE lllIRIT PETITION WII HOUT COSTS tro
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.