ANAND PRAKASH SRIVASTAVA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2020-12-10. ANAND PRAKASH SRIVASTAVA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 9411 of 2020 Anand Prakash Srivastava … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Prasad, Adv. For the State : Mr. Sanat Kumar Jha, Addl. P. P. For the Informant : Mr. Shekhar Prasad Sinha, Advocate 02 /10. 12. 2020 Heard the parties through video conferencing. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter within two weeks after the lockdown is over. In view of personal undertaking given by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are ignored for the present. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Hariharpur P. S. Case No. 04 of 2020 registered under sections 307, 302, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has murdered the mother of the informant namely Rajni Srivastava. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court to the copy of the representation filed by the husband of the deceased before the Superintendent of Police, Dhanbad wherein the husband of the deceased has given a clean chit to the petitioner, it is submitted that the petitioner is an old man of 70 years and he has been falsely implicated in this case by the informant because a property dispute. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 10. 02. 2020 as mentioned in paragraph 11 of the bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P. P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to st the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1 Class, Dhanbad in connection with Hariharpur P. S. Case No. 04 of 2020 with the condition that he will cooperate with the trial of the case. Pappu/ (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J. )
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.