SMT. P. SHEELA v. SMT. V D GEETHA
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2025-07-03. SMT. P. SHEELA v. SMT. V D GEETHA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
- 1 - CRL. RP No. 100 of 2019 C/W CRL. RP No. 101 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU RD DATED THIS THE 3 DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 100 OF 2019 C/W CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 101 OF 2019 IN CRL. RP No. 100/2019 BETWEEN: SMT. P. SHEELA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, W/O N RAMESH TH R/AT NO. 2924, 13 MAIN, ND TH 2 STAGE, 12 CROSS, D BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR BENGALURU - 560 010. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HEMANTH KUMAR K, ADVOCATE -ABSENT) AND: SMT V D GEETHA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, W/O MARIYAPPA R/AT NO. 55, TELECOM LAYOUT, ND ND 2 BANK CROSS, 2 MAIN ROAD, MAHAVEERA ROAD, MYSORE ROAD, TIMBERYARD BENGALURU - 560 072. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI RAMESH CHANDRA, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL. RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITH SECTION 401 Cr. P. C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENTS AND SENTENCE DATED 25. 03. 2014 IN C. C. NO.
5259/2009 PASSED BY THE XVIII ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, AT BENGALURU CONVICTING THE PETITIONER - 2 - CRL. RP No. 100 of 2019 C/W CRL. RP No. 101 of 2019 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF N. I. ACT AND THE ORDER IN CRL. A. NO. 304/2014 PASSED BY THE LVIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AT BENGALURU (CCH-59) DATED 04. 01. 2019 AND ACQUIT THE PETITIONER IN THE ABOVE CASE. IN CRL. RP NO. 101/2019 BETWEEN: SMT. B M INDIRA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, W/O G VENKATESH PRASAD, TH R/AT NO. 728, 9 MAIN, RD RD 3 STAGE, 3 BLOCK, BASAVESHWARANAGAR BENGALURU - 560 079. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. HEMANTH KUMAR K, ADVOCATE -ABSENT) AND: SMT. V D GEETHA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, W/O MARIYAPPA R/AT NO. 55, TELECOM LAYOUT, ND ND 2 BANK CROSS, 2 MAIN ROAD, MAHAVEERA ROAD, MYSORE ROAD, TIMBERYARD BENGALURU - 560 026. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI RAMESH CHANDRA, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL. RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITH SECTION 401 Cr. P.
C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENTS AND SENTENCE DATED 25. 03. 2014 IN C. C. NO. 5260/2009, PASSED BY THE XVIII A. C. M. M. , AT BANGALORE CONVICTING THE PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF THE N. I ACT AND THE ORDER IN CRL. A. NO. 303/2014 PASSED BY THE LVIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BANGALORE CCH-59, DATED - 3 - CRL. RP No. 100 of 2019 C/W CRL. RP No. 101 of 2019 04. 01. 2019 AND ACQUIT THE PETITIONER IN THE ABOVE CASE. THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR ORAL ORDER 1. Learned counsel for respondent present. 2. Learned counsel for petitioners absent. Learned counsel for petitioners was also absent on 16. 06. 2015. On that day the Court passed the following order: “Learned counsel for respondent present. Learned counsel for petitioner absent. The matters are of the year 2019. There are no grounds for adjournment.
However, in order to give one more opportunity the matters are being adjourned, as a last chance. If learned counsel for petitioner fails to argue the matters on the next date of hearing, the matters will be dismissed. List on 03. 07. 2025. ” 3. Inspite of the above order, learned counsel for petitioners is not present. It appears that the petitioners is - 4 - CRL. RP No. 100 of 2019 C/W CRL. RP No. 101 of 2019 not interested in prosecuting the revision petitions. Hence, both the petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE LRS List No. : 1 Sl No. : 62
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.