HARI SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2025-02-12. HARI SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2025:RJ-JD:8609] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3860/2025 Hari Singh S/o Shri Bhani Ram, Aged About 60 Years, Resident Of Village Dungrana, Tehsil Bhadra, District Hanumangarh (Raj. ). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 2. The District Collector, Hanumangarh (Raj. ). 3. Tehsildar Revenue, Bhadra, District Hanumangarh (Raj. ). 4. Land Revenue Inspector, Dungrana, Tehsil Bhadra, District Hanumangarh (Raj. ). 5. Assistant Conservator Of Forest, Hanumangarh, District Hanumangarh (Raj. ). 6. Rammurti S/o Shri Rampat Ram, Resident Of Village Dungrana, Tehsil Bhadra, District Hanumangarh (Raj. ). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tirupati Chandra HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR Order 12/02/2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach the appropriate forum for redressal of the grievances of the petitioner. However, he submits that the respondents are bent upon to demolish the house of the petitioner and, therefore, the petitioner may be granted a limited protection for approaching the appropriate forum. [2025:RJ-JD:8609] (2 of 2) [CW-3860/2025] 3. Considering the submission made before this Court, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to avail the appropriate remedy before the appropriate forum in accordance with law. 4. It is further ordered that the house of the petitioner shall not be demolished by the respondents for a period of 10 days from today. 5.
It is made clear that after a period of 10 days if the petitioner fails to get any favourable order from the appropriate forum, then the respondents will be free to proceed against him, in accordance with law. (VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J 47-/Arun P/-
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.