BARKATI and ANR. v. STATE OF RAJ. and ORS.
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: REKHA BORANA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2024-08-20. BARKATI and ANR. v. STATE OF RAJ. and ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2024:RJ-JD:34104] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1325/2011 Smt. Santosh Devi ----Petitioner Versus State Of Raj. And Ors. ----Respondents Connected With S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5075/2004 Shri Satveer ----Petitioner Versus State And Ors. ----Respondents S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6162/2010 Kishangopal ----Petitioner Versus State Of Raj. And Ors. ----Respondents S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6163/2010 Santosh Devi ----Petitioner Versus State Of Raj. And Ors. ----Respondents S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6164/2010 Barkati And Anr. ----Petitioners Versus State Of Raj. And Ors. ----Respondents S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3044/2011 Jai Singh [2024:RJ-JD:34104] (2 of 3) [CW-1325/2011] ----Petitioner Versus State Of Raj. And Anr ----Respondents S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3042/2012 Gyan Singh ----Petitioner Versus State Transport Appe. Trib. , And Ors ----Respondents S. B. Civil Writ Petition No.
3043/2012 Pawan Kumar ----Petitioner Versus State Transport Appe. Trib. , And Ors ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Thana Ram Choudhary Mr. R. K. Rathi in SBCWP No. 3044/2011 For Respondent(s) : Mr. R. K. Rathi (in all writ petitions except SBCWP No. 3044/2011) HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA Order 20/08/2024 In S. B. Civil Writ Petition Nos. 1325/2011, 6162/2010, 6163/2010, 6164/2010, 3042/2012 and 3043/2012 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Thana Ram Choudhary, pleads ‘No Instructions’ in these matters. He submits that registered notices have already been served on the petitioners/legal representatives of the deceased petitioners but he has not received any instructions. [2024:RJ-JD:34104] (3 of 3) [CW-1325/2011] 2. The notices alongwith postal receipts have been placed on record. 4. In view of the submission made, it seems that the present petitioners are not interested in pursuing the present matters. The present petitions are hence, dismissed in non-prosecution.
In S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3044/2011 1. Learned counsel Mr. R. K. Rathi, for the petitioner submits that as the other writ petitions have been dismissed, the present petition has ipso facto as a consequence, rendered infructuous. 2. In view of the submission made, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. In S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5075/2004 Let the present file be detagged from the connected bunch of files and be listed on 09. 09. 2024. (REKHA BORANA),J 408-415-T. Singh/-
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Archive: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.