Skip to main content
LawSphereX

Sh. Kottan Tongchangya and 4 Ors. v. The Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram, District Council and Minority Affairs Dept. and 3 Ors.

Court: Gauhati High Court

Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO

Judgment date:

Case summary

Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2024-01-28. Sh. Kottan Tongchangya and 4 Ors. v. The Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram, District Council and Minority...

Judgment text

Page No. # 1/3 GAHC030006282023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/143/2023 Sh. Kottan Tongchangya and 4 Ors. S/o Nishikya Tongchangya R/o Mainabapsora-I, Lawngtlai District 2: Sh. Ranjoy Kanti Tongchangya S/o Lal Kumar Tongchangya R/o Mainabapsora-I Lawngtlai District 3: Sh. Tana Kumar Tongchangya S/o Roshik Muni Tongchangya R/o Mainabapsora-I Lawngtlai District 4: Sh. Pholmon Tongchangya S/o Bishnu Kumar Tongchangya R/o Mainabapsora-I Lawngtlai District 5: Smt. Lokhi Devi Tongchangya D/o Dung Kumar Tongchangya R/o Mainabapsor-I Lawngtlai Distric VERSUS The Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram, District Council and Minority Affairs Dept. and 3 Ors. Aizawl, Mizoram 2:The Chief Executive Member Chakma Autonomous District Council R/b the Executive Secretary CADC Kamalanagar Chawngte District Lawngtlai Page No. # 2/3 3:The Executive Member CADC in-charge Local Administration Dept.

Kamalanagar through the Local Administration Officer CADC Lawngtlai District 4:The Care-taker Mainabapsora-I Village Council under CADC Lawngtlai Distric Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr Ashok Kumar Rokhum Advocate for the Respondent : Addl. AG/GA, Mizoram for R1 ORDER B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO 29. 01. 2024 Mr. A K Rokhum, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the impugned Notification dated 04. 10. 2023 has been revoked by the respondent authorities vide Notification dated 29. 12. 2023 and he has produced a copy of the said notification. On perusal of the same, it is seen that the writ petition has become infructuous. In view of above, writ petition has closed as infructuous. In respect of salaries and allowances claimed by the petitioners, the petitioners may file appropriate application before the authorities concerned and upon receiving such application, the authorities may consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law. Page No.

# 3/3 Notification dated 29. 12. 2023 produced by Mr. A K Rokhum is kept on record and marked as ‘X’ for identification. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.