NEETU SAINI AND ANR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2024-12-03. NEETU SAINI AND ANR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S. B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 33/2017 1. Neetu Saini D/o Shri Satyanarayan Saini W/o Shri Rakesh Kumar Verma, aged about 29 years R/o 204, Brahampuri, Ward No. 24, Bundi Raj. At Present R/o 128, Brahampuri, Ward No. 24, Bundi, Distt. Bundi Raj. 2. Rakesh Kumar Verma S/o Shri Mahendra Kumar Verma, aged about 32 years, R/o 128, Brahampuri, Ward No. 24, Bundi, District Bundi Raj. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs And Justice Secretariat, Raja 2. Director General Of Police Rajasthan, Jaipur Raj. 3. Superintendent Of Police, Bundi, Distt. Bundi Raj. 4. S. H. O. Police Station Kotwali, Bundi, Distt. Bundi Raj. 5. Satyanarayan Saini S/o Vednath Saini, R/o 204, Bundi, District Bundi Raj. 6. Laxmi Narayan S/o Satyanarayan Saini, R/o 204, Bundi, District Bundi Raj. 7. Parvati Saini W/o Satyanarayan Saini, R/o 204, Bundi, District Bundi Raj. 8.
Ravi Saini S/o Komal Saini, R/o 204, Bundi, District Bundi Raj. 9. Shiva S/o Komal Saini, R/o 204, Bundi, District Bundi Raj. 10. Radha Bai W/o Shri Komal Saini, R/o 204, Bundi, District Bundi Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary-PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Judgment / Order 03/12/2024 (2 of 2) [CRLW-33/2017] 1. This criminal writ petition seeking protection has been filed by the petitioners way back in the year 2017 and thereafter, interim protection has also been ordered by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 11. 07. 2017. 2. Since, more than seven years have been passed after filing of the present criminal writ petition and no substantial order has been passed by this Court thereafter, it appears that no further cause of action survives with the petitioners to continue with this petition and by efflux of time, this criminal writ petition has become infructuous. 3.
Accordingly, the instant criminal writ petition stands dismissed as rendered infructuous. The order dated 11. 07. 2017 stands vacated. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to file appropriate application for revival of the present criminal writ petition, if need so arises. 4. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/262
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.