ARTI SHARMA v. STATE TH.EDUCATION DEPTT.AND ORS.
Court: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jammu and Kashmir judgment dated 2026-07-30. ARTI SHARMA v. STATE TH.EDUCATION DEPTT.AND ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Sr. No. 44 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU SWP No. 631/2013 IA No. 867/2013 Arti Sharma …. Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- Mr. Dhruv Pant, Advocate V/s State of J&K and others …. Respondent(s) Through :- Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG (Sr. Advocate) with Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, Assisting Counsel Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 30. 07. 2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the name of the petitioner figures in the select panel and therefore, in light of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in case titled “Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir & Ors. Vs. Saba Wani” decided on 30. 04. 2026, the respondents are under legal obligation to accord fresh consideration to the case of the petitioner. 2. Mr. Raman Sharma, learned AAG is not averse to according consideration to the case of the petitioner in light of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court and also in terms of the applicable rules and as per the law. 3.
With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping this writ petition alive, the same is, accordingly, disposed of with a direction to the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 to accord consideration to the case of the petitioner strictly in terms of the applicable rules and as per law in the light of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court (Supra), within a period of four weeks SWP No. 631/2013 Page 1 of 2 from the date a certified copy of this order along with complete set of the writ petition along with annexures is made available to the said respondents. 4. Needless to say that while according consideration to the case of the petitioner and all other stake holders who may be connected with the issue in question, be heard and the petitioner will be at liberty to place on record the requisite documents, if any required, before the respondents. 5. Disposed of in the manner indicated above. (Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu: 30. 07.
2026 Pawan Angotra SWP No. 631/2013 Page 2 of 2
Source: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.