Smt.G.Mariyamma v. The District Collector

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: G.M. MOHIUDDIN

Judgment date: 2025-12-04

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-04. Smt.G.Mariyamma v. The District Collector. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

[ 3484 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G. M. MOHIUDDIN 1 1 Between 1. Smt. G. Mariyamma, Wo. Jayaram, Aged 42 years, R/o. Azad Chandrasekhar Nagar, Easi Marredpally, Addautta, Secunderabad 2. Baswamma, wo. Baswaiah, Aged 33 years, R/o. Azad chandrasekhar Nagar, East Manedpally, Addautta, Secunderabad 3. G. Venkatamma, w/o Pedda Parasuramulu, 50 R/o. Azad 4g"! . yea. ls, , Chandrasekhar'Nagar, East Marredpally, Addautta, SecunderabaO Aged 40 years, R/o. Azad Chandrasekhar 4. G. Venkatamma, W/o. Satyam, . Secunderabacl Nagar, East Marredpally, Addautta, Age-d 45 years,. R/o. Azad Chandrasekhar 5. Kotamma, W/o. Venkateswarlu, Nagar, East Marredpally, Addautta, Secunderabacl Nagar, 50 R/o. Azad Chandrasekhar 6. M. Laxmi, Wo. Bagaiah, Aged . yeafs,. East Marredpally, Addautta, Secunderabad R/o. Azad chandrasekhar 7. K. Saritha, w/o.

Narsing Rao, Age{ 38 year. s, Nagar, East Marredpally, Addautta, Secunderabad years, R/o. Azad Chandrasekhar Nagar' 8. D. Balamani, W/o. Mallesh, Aged 45 East Marredpally, Addautta, Secunderabad g. Aged years, R/o. Azad chandrasekhar smt. J. Laxmi,. w/o. J. Narsing. Rao, 40. Nagar, East Marredpally, Addautta, Secunderabad Aged 40 years,. Fl/o'Azad Chandrasekhar 10. Smt. J. Yadamma, W/o. Ramesh, Nagar, East Manedpally, Addautta, Secunderabad 5f R/o'Azad Chandrasekhar 1 l. Smt. A. Sugunamma, W/o.! qQag! I, {geO Ve. ary. , Nagar, Ea-st Ma rred pa lly, Add a utta, Secund erabacl 12. Fathima, W/o. Maqbool, Aged 34 years, R/o. Azad Chandrasekhar Nagar' . - Eist Mairedpally, Addautta-, Secunderabad 35 years, R/o. Azad Chandrasekhar Nagar' 13. M. Laxmi, Wo. Shankar, Age-d . East Manedpally, Addautta, Secunderabad East years, R/o. Azad Chandrasekhar Nagar' 14. Tabitha, Wo. Prasad, Aged 51 Maned fally, Addautta, Secunderabad years, R/o. Azad Chandrasekhar Nagar' 15. Meena, Wo. V.

Venkatesh, Aged 28 East Manedpally, Addautta, Secunderabad 16. Urm. ila, Wo. lndra. Singh, Ag_ed 40. years, Rt/o. Azad Chandrasekhar Nagar, East lVlanedpally, Addautta, Secund6rabad 17. K. S. 1-axmi, Wo. Ramulu,. Aggd 40. yea. rs,. Ri/o. Azad Chandrasekhar Nagar, East lVlanedpally, Addautta,-secund6rabad 18. S.. Laxnramma, Wo. Tirupathaiah, Aged 35 years, Rt/o. Azad Chandrasekhar Nagar, tast Marredpally, Addautta, Secundejrabad ... PETITIONERS AND 1 . The District collector, Hyderabad District, Nampally Station Road, Hyderabad 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Secunderabad 3. The Tarsildar,, Marredpally Revenue Mandal, Near Addagutta, Secunderabad. 4. The Project Hyderab_ad Housing Corporation ! ir99t91, O/o. Co llector, Hyderabad District Nampally Station Road, ...

RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to lssue a writ order or direction pa(icularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in making attempts to demolish the houses c,f the petitioners without accommodating them in the list of beneficiaries ard thereby in issuing the possession certificates on the basis of the bogus/benami beneficiaries list by deleting the names of the genuine/eligible candidates frorn the beneficiaries list of Housing Scheme in c section at Azaad chandrasekhar Nagar, East Maredpaily, Addagutta, secunderabad, ignoring the repeated representations for rectification .

of the' beneficiaries list, as arbitrary, illegal and null and void and consequenfly set-aside the irregular, bogus beneficiaries list and prepare a fresh list of beneficiaries by conducting an impartial enquiry through an official not below the rank of R. D. o. other than the local R. D. o. and by followin,S due procedure for selection of beneficiaries under the Housing Scheme. O:1 OF 2(t11 P. NO: I 7268 0F 11) Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased Stay of demolishment ol the houses of the petitioners without accommodating them in the list of beneficiaries, including issuance of possession certificates to the candidates basing upon the present bogus/benami list of beneficiaries at C Section of Azaad Chandrasekhar Nagar, East Maredpally, Addagutta, Secunderabad pending the disposal of the main w. p. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRt P.

NTTHYA NAGESWARI Counsel for the Respondents No 1 to 3: Gp FOR REVENUE counsel for the Respondent No 4: SRt c. BUcHl BABU, STANDING couNSEL The Court made the following: ORDER IN'fHE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELAITGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G. M. MOHIUDDIN WRIT PETITION No. 14314 of 2O11 Date: O4. L2. 2O25 Between: G. Mariyalnma and 17 others Petitioners AND The District Collector, Hyderaba,J District, Nampally Station Road, Hyderaba,l and 3 others. ... Respondents ORDER: No representation on behalf of the petitioners. Even on earlier occasions i. e. , on I5. O9. 2025, as there was no I representation on behalf of the petitioners and as such, the t matter was directed to be listed on L3. Lo. 2o25 under the caption ifor dismissal'. Therafter, on 25. LO. 2O25 as a last chance ttre matter was posted to 14. 1L. 2o25 under the same caption, even though there was no representation on behalf of the petitic,ners. on 21. L1.

2o25, it was noted that if the learned counsel f<lr the petitioners does not enter appearance by the l :- ,reI \. \ next date of hearing, the matter shall stand dismissed automatically. Today when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners and it appears that the petitioners are not having any inclination to prosecute this case- As such, this court has no other option except to dismiss the Writ Petition for non-prosecution. 2. Accordiqgly, the writ petition stands dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. SD/. P. PONNA KRISH ASSISTANT //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER l To, 1. One CC to SRl. P. NITHYA NAGESWARI, tlcl 2. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad . [OUT] 3. One CC to SRI C. BUCHI BABU, STANDTNG COUNSEL, [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies DAN TKS HIGH COURT DATED;0411212025 T}IE S t ORDER o c) of 2011 WP. No.

14314 1 't ;. ;. it ? 0? g )t *. PETITION THE WRIT DISMISSING FOR NON-PROSEGUTION COSTS WITHOUT $d

Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.