Kedar Yadav v. The State of Bihar
Court: Patna High Court
Bench: MR. JUSTICE R. P. MISHRA
Judgment date:
Case summary
Patna High Court judgment dated 2025-12-03. Kedar Yadav v. The State of Bihar. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 82697 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -424 Year-2025 Thana- KUCHAIKOTE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Kedar Yadav S/o Late Nagina Yadav R/o Village - Balua Tola, P. S - Kuchaikote, District - Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lokesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, A. P. P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 03-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kuchaikote P. S. Case No. 424 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3.
The prosecution case, in short, is that total 185. 400 liters of country made liquor was recovered from nine sacs near dam. Petitioner was arrested on the spot. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned counsel Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 82697 of 2025(2) dt. 03-12-2025 2/2 for the petitioner further submitted that the recovery has been made from open place, which is accessible to public at large. The petitioner is in custody since 20. 09. 2025 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Kuchaikote P. S. Case No. 424 of 2025. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) manish/- U T
Source: Patna High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.