Bokka Karthik v. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-14. Bokka Karthik v. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited and 3 others. Read the judgment and...
Judgment text
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA (Special Original Jurisdiction) IVONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PETITION NO 18254 0F 2020 Between: Bokka Karthik, S/o. Bokka . , Venkateswarlu, aged 27 years, -about OiC. 0nemptoyee, R/o. MD-14th Block F-2, Rudrampur Street, Kothagudem, Bhdradri Kbth-agudem (Khammam)District. ... PETITIONER AND Rep. by its chairman and lt4anaging 1. The Sinoareni collieries company Limited, Hills, Hyderabad' Directorl Singareni Bhavan, Red 2 The Director (PA & W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL)' Kothagudem, Kammam District 3 TheGenerallvlanager(Safty),CorporateOfficeTheSingareniCollieries District Cornpjny Limited (SCCL), Kothagudem, Khammam (Personnel RC) The Singareni Collieries 4 The Deoutv General N,4anaqer District' Company Limited. Kothagudem, Khammam ,,.
RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of ihe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issuetoawrit,orderordirection,moreparticularlyoneinthenatureofWritof not ntrnaurr. , declaring that the action of the 1st Respondent-compa! y- -i! announcing the resulis, pursuant to the written examination held on 0110312020 f or on ,pp"rtr". t i" the post of Management Trai. nee (E&lV)' E-2 GRADE ! E-IJERNAL) No 84/2020' on the file ttiJ;;";"; of pendency of crimiial proceedings in Crime/FlR individuals patoncrra, or-p6 Bhadiadri Kothagudem District, registered against some d-uring the course of written examination as illegal' who are committed mal-practice arbitrary, unjust, contrary io tr*, violitive of principles of natural justice and also ,iorrti""'ot Artictes-t+ unO-it ot'tf'" Constitution of lndia, and u nco nstitutional and ionr"qr* v direct the Respondents to consider.
the case of the petitioner for pendency of crime/FlR to the said post, witlrout reference the ;;;i. ;;;i ,to pulon"ha, Bhadradri Kothagudem District, with all No. B4l2020, on the fite ot"Fs, consequential benefits. IAN O: 1 OF 2020 PetitionUnderSectionl5lCPcprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedinthe pleased to Higrr court may be direct the attioavit Jiteo in support of the petition,'tre 'the petltioner for appointment to the post of ;;;il";i; io consioer th;-;;; of to the (EXTERNAL)' without reference (E&rV), E-2 GR4PE rtlrlrg;;". t Trainee the file of PS' Paloncha' Bhadradri p*0""*v crire l'rrR ilo. aqtzozo, on "i writ petition in the interest of justice. k;il;;;", District, pending disposat of the Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI CH' VENKAT RAMAN (SC FOR SINGARENI C) SRI J' SREENIVASA RAO' Counsel for the Respondents: ORDER The Court made the following: HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE ABHINAND KI-] N'IAR S HAVILI W. P. No.
18254 OF 2020 ORDEIT Learned counsel appearing for thc petitioner submits that the cause in this rvrit petition does not sun'ive lor adjudication and hence, thc u'rit petition has become inlructu<. rus, Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closcd. I S D/. CH. VENKATESWARULU ASSISTANT REG R //TRUE COPY// SECTI OFFICER To, '1 . One CC to Sri. CH. Venkat Raman, Advocate IOPUCI (SC for Singareni C) Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri. J. Sreenivasa Rao, 3. Two C. D. CoPies Prk -vu,- ; HIGH COURT DATED:. 141'l212O2O tr;. S IA H h ( t c 2021 (. ) 0 2 JAN ORDER * WP. No. 18254 of 2020 * i. F TiI C Dismissing the WP. as infructuous without costs.
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.