ANILKUMAR SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS
Court: High Court of Manipur
Bench: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Manipur judgment dated 2020-08-20. ANILKUMAR SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Item No. 2 (Through video conferencing) IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WP(C) No. 461 of 2020 Anilkumar Singh, aged about 30 years, S/O Amu Singh of Lairen Kabi, P. O. Lamsang Bazar & P. S. Lamsang, Imphal West District-Pin : 759146 at present posting at GC, CRPF, Imphal, having ASI/Min No. 105044952. …. Petitioner/s - Versus – Union of India represented through its Home Secretary (Ministry of Home Affairs) North Block, New Delhi, Government of India. -110001 & 4 Ors. .... Respondent/s BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH 20. 08. 2020 Heard Mr. M. Devananda, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. S. Vijayanand Sharma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of all the respondents. [2] The only grievance of the petitioner is that he was promoted to ASI (Min) from Head Constable w. e. f. 24. 01. 2019. Just after giving such promotion, he had been posted at Group Centre, Imphal.
[3] It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that the normal tenure of his posting should be 3(three) years and before completion of his tenure th from the date of his promotion he has been transferred to 87 Battalion, Jiribam, which is against the standing order of transfer policy issued by the authorities. WP(C) No. 461 of 2020 Page 1 [4] On the other hand, Mr. S. Vijayanand Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the petitioner has already completed his tenure and accordingly, he has been transferred after completion of his tenure. [5] After hearing both the counsel and after perusal of the records, I am inclined to dispose of this application by giving the following directions:- (a) The petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh representation to the authorities concerned for modification or revocation of his transfer order within a period of 10(ten) days, failing which he will be debarred from doing so.
(b) On receipt of such representation, the authorities may consider such representation on its own merit in accordance with the relevant provision of law by issuing a speaking order. [6] It is made clear that in case if the petitioner submitted his representation he shall be allowed to continue in his present place of posting till the said representation is considered and disposed of by the authorities. With the aforesaid directions this writ petition is disposed of. A copy of this order be furnished to the counsel of the parties through their respective e-mail. JUDGE Lhaineichong Digitally WAIKH signed by WAIKHOM OM TONEN MEITEI Date: TONEN2020. 08. 20 15:06:42 MEITEI +05'30' WP(C) No. 461 of 2020 Page 2
Source: High Court of Manipur. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.