Skip to main content
LawSphereX

STATE OF MANIPUR AND 2 OTHERS v. WAIROKPAM DUTTA SINGH

Court: High Court of Manipur

Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GOLMEI GAIPHULSHILLU KABUI

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Manipur judgment dated 2024-06-25. STATE OF MANIPUR AND 2 OTHERS v. WAIROKPAM DUTTA SINGH. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

Digitally signed by SHAMURAILATPAM SUSHIL SHAMURAILATPAM SUSHIL SHARMA P a g e | 1 SHARMA Date: 2024. 06. 28 11:09:53 +05'30' Items No. 68-71 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WA No. 18 of 2024 State of Manipur and Another Appellants Vs. Wairokpam Dutta Singh and Another Respondents With MC(WA) No. 38 of 2024 With MC(WA) No. 39 of 2024 With WA No. 19 of 2024 BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GOLMEI GAIPHULSHILLU KABUI 25. 06. 2024 Siddharth Mridul, C. J. : Mrs. Ch. Sundari, learned GA, appears on behalf of the appellants and Mr. N. Bipin, learned counsel, appears on behalf of the respondents. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties invite our attention rd to the Office Memorandum dated 23 May, 2024 issued at Imphal in relation to appointment under the Die-in-harness Scheme.

For the sake of completeness and in view of its relevance, the entire rd said Office Memorandum dated 23 May, 2024 is extracted hereinbelow :- “GOVERNMENT OF MANIPUR DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL & ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS (PERSONNEL DIVISION) O F F I C E M E M O R A N D U M rd Imphal, the 23 May, 2024 Subject : Appointment under the Die-in-Harness Scheme. P a g e | 2 No. DIH-30/1/2023-DP-DP: The Die-in-harness Scheme in the State of Manipur had been th abolished vide order No. 20/1/85-DP dated 15 June, 2002 and the scheme was subsequently th th restored on 16 December, 2006 vide order No. 20/15/2002-DIH/DP dated 16 December, 2006. 2. Consequent upon the restoration of Die-in-Harness scheme, the State Government th had issued certain clarifications vide OM No. 20/15/2002-DIH/DP dated 6 June, 2007. Sub para (i) and (ii) of para no. 1 of the said OM is reproduced below: i. The Die-in -Harness scheme was abolished vide orders dated 15-6-2002. The OM of even no.

dated 29-10-2002 clearly states that no application for appointment under the Die-in-Harness Scheme should be received. Therefore, all applications submitted in between 15-6-2002 and 16-12-2006 shall be treated as invalid applications. ii. Applicants whose applications have been treated invalid as above, should submit fresh applications to the concerned Department within 2(two) months from the date of issue of this OM”. 3. It has now been brought out that the above referred OM No. 20/15/2002-DIH/DP th dated 6 June, 2007 was not published in newspapers for general information of the general public, barring a mention of the same as news item in few newspaper. As a result of such lack of information, it is likely that many persons who might have been desirous of seeking employment under the Die-in-Harness Scheme may not have submitted applications for appointment as required under para 1 (ii) of the said OM. 4.

In consideration of these circumstances, and in the interest of fairness and justice, the State Government has decided to give one opportunity to such persons for enabling him/her to submit fresh applications for appointment under the scheme, by way of relaxation th of para no. 1 (ii) of OM No. 20/15/2002-DIH/DP dated 6 June, 2007, subject to the following conditions: 4. 1 Submission of fresh applications for appointment to the concerned Department will be permissible within a period of 2 (two) months from the date of publication of this OM in the official gazette. 4. 2 Applications submitted on expiry of the said prescribed time frame as above, shall be treated as null and void and will stand automatically rejected. No separate correspondence will be made in this regard to such applicant. 4. 3 This relaxation is a one-time measure. P a g e | 3 4.

4 Such relaxations shall be applicable only in connection with such government employees who had died in harness during the period between 15-06-2002 and 16-12-2006. 4. 3 Applications for appointment, which were previously submitted under para 1(ii) of th OM dated 6 June, 2007, and had been subsequently rejected on grounds of non-fulfilment of age criteria, incomplete documents or any other eligibility criteria as prescribed under the extant rules/guidelines of the Die-in-Harness Scheme, as may have been issued by the State Government from time-to-time, in respect of government employees who had died in harness during the period between 15-06-2002 and 16-12-2006, shall not be covered by this relaxation and the status of such applications shall remain as ‘rejected’. 4. 6 The seniority position of an applicant under this OM, shall be fixed by the concerned Department based on the date of expiry/death of the deceased government employee. 4.

7 Applicants who had already submitted their applications as per para no. 1 (ii) of the th OM dated 6 June, 2007 within the time frame prescribed therein, need not be submit again. 5. These instructions shall come into force with effect from the date of publication of this Office Memorandum in the official gazette. PH. BHAVANANDA SHARMA, Joint Secretary to the Government of Manipur. ” Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the original writ petitioner rd says that in view of the terms of the said Office Memorandum dated 23 May, 2024, they are entitled to the benefit under the Die-in-harness Scheme. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants states that in the event the original writ petitioners are found to qualify with all the rd requirements elaborated under the said Office Memorandum dated 23 May, 2023 and in accordance with law, they will be duly considered for appointment thereunder, expeditiously, as per the seniority list. Directed accordingly.

P a g e | 4 The above writ appeals are disposed of with the above direction. No further relief is prayed for. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are disposed of accordingly. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Sushil

Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.