S.Sridharan v. The Tahsildar
Court: Madras High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
Judgment date:
Case summary
Madras High Court judgment dated 2026-04-28. S.Sridharan v. The Tahsildar. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
WP No. 15230 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 28-04-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 15230 of 2026 1. S. Sridharan S/o. G. Sankaran, Plot No. 24,2nd Street, Venkateswara Nagar, Valasaravakkam, Chennai-87. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Tahsildar Maduravoyal Taluk, Bharathi Salai,Phase-II, Nolambur, Chennai. Respondent(s) WP No. 15230 of 2026 PRAYER Directing the respondent to update and mutate the revenue records including the land ownership details . E No. 10 (1) Chitta (Patta), A Register, relating to Survey number 201/13,(old S. No. 201/2) Valasaravakkam Village, Maduravoyal taluk, as 1855 Sq. ft equal to 0-1. 72 ares instead of 0-1. 50 ares consistent with the title deed of the petitioner and Field Measurement Plan uploaded in the Government Portal and pass. WP No. 15230 of 2026 For Petitioner(s): Mr. N. Suresh For Respondent(s): Mr. D.
Ravichander,SGP ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondent to update and mutate the revenue records including the land ownership details for the property https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis WP No. 15230 of 2026 morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition based on the petitioner’s representation dated 06. 09. 2025 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2. According to the petitioner, eventhough FMB sketch was rectified by the respondent for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, till date, in the revenue records, the same has not been updated. The petitioner has given a representation on 06. 09. 2025 to the respondent for the aforesaid purpose. Since the said representation has not been considered till date, this writ petition has been filed. 3. Mr. D. Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 4.
No prejudice would be caused to the respondent if the petitioner’s representation, seeking for updation and mutation of the revenue records including the land ownership details pursuant to the correction of the FMB sketch for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition is considered on merits and in accordance with law after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 5. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation. https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis WP No. 15230 of 2026 6. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representation dated 06. 09.
2025, seeking for updation and mutation of the revenue records including the land ownership details pursuant to the correction of the FMB sketch for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs. 28-04-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ab To 1. The Tahsildar Maduravoyal Taluk, Bharathi Salai,Phase-II, Nolambur, Chennai. https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis WP No. 15230 of 2026 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab WP No. 15230 of 2026 28-04-2026 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis
Source: Madras High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.