Maddela Rayappa v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: SUREPALLI NANDA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-06-10. Maddela Rayappa v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
132s21 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA WRIT PETITION NO: 29605 OF 2023 Between: t\/addela Rayappa, S/o Showry aged about 56 years Occ. Deputy Director A. P. Khadi Village lndustries Board Adilabad, Adilabad District ... PETITIONER AND 1 . The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Secretary to Government and Commissioner for lndustrial Promotion lndustries and Commerce (Vigilance) Department Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Chief Executive Officer, T. S. Khadi and Village Board Hyderabad. 3. The Chairman, T. S. Khadi and Village Board Hyderabad. ...
RES'ONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of lvlandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in issuing the sanction order vide proc. NO. KVlB/Vig. CelI/ACB/DDlADB|2O13|2O23-24 daled 1-O7-2023 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and ultra vires and contrary to Art. 14 of the Constitution of lndia and set aside the sanction order vide proc. NO. KVlB/Vig. Cell/ACB/DDlADB|201312023-24 dated 1-O7-2023 issued by the 3rd respondent in the interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Suspend the sanction order vide Proc. No. KVIB/Vig.
Cell/ACB/DD/ADB/201312023- 24 dated 1-O7 -2023 issued by the 3rd respondent, pending disposal of the above writ petition. ^"' -v Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D. RAMAKRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: GP FOR INDUSTRIES COMMERCE Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 & 3: SRI L. PRABHAKAR REDDY, SC FOR TS KHADI & VB The Court made the following: ORDER rt HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA WRIT PETITION 0. 29605 0F 2023 ORDER: Heard Sri D. Rama Krishna, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Industries and Commerce appearing on behalf of respondent No. 1 and Sri L. Prabhakar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for T. S. Khadi and Village Board appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos. 2 and 3. 2. Thepetitioner approached the Court seekinq Drayer as under: "... to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of 'Mandamus' declarlng the action of the 3'd respondent in issuing the sanction order , I vide proc.
No. KVIB/Vig. Cell/ACB /DD/ ADB/20t3/2023-24 I I dated l-07-2023 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and ultravires and contrary to Art. 14 of the Constitution of India and set aside the sanction order vide p roc. N O. KVI B/Vi g. Cel l/ACB / DD / ADB / 20 13 / 2023 - 24 dated l-07-2023 issued by the 3'd respondent in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances oF the case. " I \F-. @ -o€4i \. ... ;:ii 3. It is represented by the learned Standing Counsel for T. S. Khadi and Village Board appearing on behalf oF the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 that the cause of action in the present writ petition does not survive for adjudication any more in view of the fact that the subject ACB case had been quashed by this Court vide order dated 23. 09. 2024 passed in Crl. P. No,3224 of 2023. 4. Bringing the said submission of the learned Standing Counsel for T. S. Khadi and Village Board appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.
2 and 3 on record, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, there shalt be no order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall also stand closed. SD/. S. MALLIKARJUNA RAO STANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1 One CC to SRI D. RAMAKRISHNA, Advocate [O cl 2 Two CCs to GP FOR INDUSTRIES COMMERC High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT] 3 One CC to SRI L. PRABHAKAR REDDY, SC FOR TS KHADI & VB IOPUC] 4 Two CD Copies PSK. GJP HIGH COURT DATED:1010612025 ORDER WP. No. 29605 of 2023 f rrE ST4I €' ci q J o ? JUl,l lL) 2 3 M a -t Orc DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS L
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.