Govind Kumar Singh @ Bhola Singh @ Bhola Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar
Court: Patna High Court
Bench: MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
Judgment date:
Case summary
Patna High Court judgment dated 2025-12-10. Govind Kumar Singh @ Bhola Singh @ Bhola Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar. Read the judgment and case details...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 43365 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -35 Year-2025 Thana- MANJHI District- Saran ====================================================== Govind Kumar Singh @ Bhola Singh @ Bhola Kumar Singh Son of Kameshwar Singh Resident of Village - Tajpur, P. S. - Manjhi, Dist. - Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Lalan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 5 10-12-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109, 324(1), 352, 351(2), 351 and 3(5) of the BNS registered in connection with Manjhi P. S. Case No. 35 of 2025. 3.
As per allegation, while the informant along with one Prabhakar Singh was on way to market, the accused persons, including the petitioner, waylaid them. In the process of quarrel, co-accused Ajit Kumar Sngh assaulted the informant on his head, by reason of which he became injured. Then co-accused Shivam Kumar Singh assaulted Prabhakar Singh by means of iron rod on his neck, as a result of which he became unconscious. Thereafter the petitioner also tried to assault the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 43365 of 2025(5) dt. 10-12-2025 2/2 informant and Prabhakar Singh, but with the help of the villagers, they were saved. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that specific allegation of assault is against co-accused Ajit Kumar Singh and Shivam Kumar. The allegation against the petitioner is that he attacked the informant but was saved.
The learned counsel further submitted that the FIR itself shows that the petitioner did not cause any kind of injury to the informant or any other person. 5. Considering the above facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks from the date of communication of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-XI, Saran at Chapra in connection with Manjhi P. S. Case No. 35 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) CrPC/482(2) of the BNSS. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) HR/- U T
Source: Patna High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.