Skip to main content
LawSphereX

L. Anasurya v. State of Telangana

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: A.ABHISHEK REDDY

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-08-25. L. Anasurya v. State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 11736 OF 2020 Between: L. Anasurya, W/o. late Shankar Rao, Aged about 85 years, Occ: house wife, R/o Chennapuram village, Regonda Mandal, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District ... PETITIONER AND 1. State of Telangana, rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The District Collector, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Bhupalpally Division, Jayashankar Bhupalpally district. 4. The Tahasildar, Bhupalpally Mandal, Jayashankar Bhupalpally district. ...

RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in considering the applications dated 2. 7. 2020, 10. 3. 2019 and 20. '10. 20',l8 for allotment of agricultural land under freedom fighters quota as per the G. O. Ms. No. 185 Revenue (Assn l) Department dated 11. 3. 1997 as arbitrary and illegal and contrary the G. O. Ms. No. 185 Revenue (Assn l) Department dated 11. 3. 1997 consequently direct the respondents to consider the '10. 3. 2019 application dated 2. 7. 2020, and 20. 10. 2018 and to allot the land under freedom fighters quota to the petitioner.

lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No,2 to consider the application dated 2. 7. 2020, 10. 3. 20'19 and 20. 10. 2018 and to allot the land under freedom fighters quota as per the G. O. Ms. '1 '1 No. 185 Revenue (Assn-l) Depadment dated . 3. 1997 pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. RAVI KUMAR VADLAKONDA Counsel forthe Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER \7 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 11736 of 2O2O ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the inaction of the respondents in considering the applications dated 02- O7-2O20, 10-03-2019 and 20-10-2018, made by the petitioner, for allotment of agricultural land under freedom fighters quota as per G. O. Ms. No.

185 Revenue (Assn I) Department dated 1 1-03- 1997, as arbitrary and illegal, and to direct the respondents to consider the said applications. The petitioner claims to be a freedom fighter and she has given the above representations to the official respondents to assign agricultural land under the relevant rules and policies made for the purpose o[ assigning Government lands to freedom lighters. The learned Government Pleader has stated that the Court may give a direction to the ofhcial respondents to consider the petitioner's latest representation dated 02-07-2020, which has been received through registered post acknowledgment due, and direct the official respondents to pass necessary orders on merits, strictly in accordance with the Government policy and the relevant Government Orders issued from time to time.

In view of the above made submission, the writ petition is disposed ol directing the offlcial respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated O2-O7 -2O2O, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of this order. The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. SD/-K. AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGIS //TRUE COPY' SEC OFFICER To, I . The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, State of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The District Collector, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Bhupalpally Division, Jayashankar Bhupalpally district. 4. The Tahasildar, Bhupalpally [t/andal, Jayashankar Bhupalpally district. 5. One CC to Sri Ravi Kumar Vadlakonda, Advocate IOPUC] 6. Two CCs to the GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. (OUT) 7.

Two CD Copies CHR NZ HIGH COURT DATED:2510812020 1 ll c sTA e o 0 3 SEPztlzc Lo l,) '... (.. t a: ORDER W. P. No. 11736 of 2020 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS slV. I c-optez: f ,\rF-

Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.