Dubbaka Srinu Sreenaiah v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: J SREENIVAS RAO
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-12. Dubbaka Srinu Sreenaiah v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
\ [ 3303 I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 16388 OF 2025 Between: 1. Dubbaka Srinu @ Sreenaiah, S/o. Buchaiah, Age. 49 Years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. chinthakunfla Village, Kondamallepally Mandal, Nalgonda Distriit. 2. Dubbaka Kalamma, wo. srinu @ sreenaiah, years, Age. 47 occ. Asricutture, R/o. chinthakunfla. vitt{e, k;;d;m;irepalr/ rr,ranoir, Nitgonda District. 3' Dubbaka venkataiah, s/o. Buchaiah, gg years, chintha 4ge occ. Agricurture, R/0. ku nua vila s e, ron oamiir6o;6 ;;;n,ll6Jno, District. 4. Dubb-aka Shirisha, D/o. Srinu (O , nv"-cniitn'rffi ;'viriJg"I'K;royr? 1,ffi ? , ,lflii,r^fl ,}fru:ffi . ,s,ro"nt, ... PET|T|ONER/ACCUSED NO. 1to 4 AND 'lffi1lflF;"J,Islilff t? Hs,ysB""o;#. f3,:ffij5ti,,ti. i;;iligi? ,,i ... RESPONDENT No. 1 ' ,i[j,9xiHl'H,il? ,:-uilUl: ,gi? ,Xs,? sJ],,fr,;;,1r. r,,",1! la3,i.
i;;tflli,lr,,,E No'2/DEFAt'o aorpLArNANTs petition . under section stated in the ;t:t"'DENT Men lissffi sl';',x;[Xr],fl #]':,J. ffi h$rl#f+f,{#ffi l. A. NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section srated in S2g o. , the Mem oeprease;-,;'=Ji:? ;:,? ,fl ,*? :fu'. g1,. ^",L? ,fr iii'fl"lln-. :i#ffi l1! i{{},fl[",,";:[n:l "umstances eed nsi ;;;;d,; appearance in S. C. No. 50 of 2024, before the Special Sessions Judge for SC/STs cum ll Additional District and Sessions Judge, at Nalgonda District. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of / Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of SMT DHANA LAKSHMI TALLAPALEM, Advocate for the Petitioner and JITHENDER RAO VEERAMALLA, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and of None Appeared for the Respondent No. 2 The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA -a AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE J. SREENIVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.
16388 of 2025 Date: 12. 12. 2025 Between: Dubbaka Srinu Sreenaiah and three others @ ... Petitioners AND The State of Telangana, through S. F[. O. , Kondamallepally P. S. , Nalgonda District, represented by its Public Prosecutor, Telangana State High Court at Hyderabad and another ... Respondents ORDER This Criminal Petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings in S. C. No. 50 of 2024 on the file of Special Sessions Judge for SCs/STs (POA) Act-cum-Il Additional District and Sessions Judge at Nalgonda. 2. Heard Ms. T. Dhanalakshmi, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. V. Jithendar Rao, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No. 1. 3. Though the criminal petition was filed seeking to quash the proceedings in S. C. No.
5O of 2024 on the file of Special Sessions Judge for SCs/STs (POA) Act-cum-Il Additional District and il Sessions Judge at Nalgonda, during the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners restricted his prayer requesting this Court to dispense with the appeararlce of the petitioners/accused Nos. l to 4 in S. C. No. 50 of 2024 on the file of' Special Sessions Judge for SCs/STs (POA) Act-cum-[[ Additional District and Sessions Judge at Nalgonda, on the ground that the petitioner Nos. l to 3 are eaking out their livelihood by doing agriculture and petitioner No. 4 is a student and therefore, it is very difficult to attend the Court on each and every date of adjournnrent. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has not opposed the submission made by the leamed counsel fbr petitioners 5. In view of the above submissions, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the pr-esence of the petitioners/accused Nos. l to 4 in S. C. No.
50 of 2024on the file of Special Sessions Judge for SCs/srs (PoA) Act-cum-Il Additional District and Sessions Judge at Nalgonda, is dispensed with, subject to the condition that they shall represent through their counsel on each and every date of hearing. If the presence of the petitioners is required, they shall appear before the trial Court. In case of their non-appearance on the specific date fixed by the trial Courl fbr their appearance, the trial Court is entitled to proceed with the matter, in accordance with law. 6 Accordingly, the criminal petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shail stand closed. SD/. B. REKHA RANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. THE Special Sessions Judge for SC/STs cum ll Additional District and Sessions Judge, at Nalgonda District. 2. The Station House Officer, Kondamallepally Police Station, Nalgonda District. 3. Two CCs to the PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court for the state of Telangana [OUT] 4.
One CC to SMT. DHANA LAKSHMI TALLAPALEM Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies DDN/PSL w .. ji l-n HIGH COURT DATED:1211212025 OF e a itl'. . s, a. :. : \ oL',f . , + . s" kq,q+ ORDER CRLP. No. 163 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION c4"b % i<e
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.