SANWILL SRIVASTAVA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2024-12-10. SANWILL SRIVASTAVA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 5852 of 2023 Sanwill Srivastava, S/o Late Ramesh Prasad Srivastava, R/o Sai Kripa Srivastava House, Himgiri Plastic Tank Factory, Neemtand Chuttu, PO-Chuttu, PS-Sadar, District- Ranchi… Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. James Nayan Toppo ... … Opposite Parties With A. B. A. No. 6527 of 2024 Manwill Srivastava, S/o Late Ramesh Prasad Srivastava @ Late Ramesh Sanwill Srivastava, R/o Flat No. 104, Srikrishna Apartment, Bhonsle Lane, Harihar Singh Road, PO-Morabadi, PS-Bariatu, District-Ranchi ... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Rishu Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, A. P. P. Mr. Vineet Kumar Vashistha, A. P. P For the Opposite Party No. 2 : Mr. Jitendra Shankar Singh, Adv. Mr. Randhir Kumar, Advocate [In ABA No. 5852/2023] ----- 19/10. 12.
2024 The petitioners apprehending their arrest for the offences punishable under Sections 417/420/120-B of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Sadar P. S. Case No. 118 of 2023, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi, have prayed for grant of anticipatory bail. 2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering that it is a case under Sections 417/420/120-B of the Indian Penal Code, the sentences for which are up to 07 years, as well as keeping in view the guidelines laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of “Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar & Anr. ” reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273, particularly paragraph no. 12 of the same, followed by the judgment rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of “Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr. ” reported in 2022 (10) SCC 51 as well as the observation made in the case of “Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.
” reported in 2024 (9) SCC 198, without commenting on the merit of the present case, the petitioners are directed to appear and seek regular bail before the concerned Trial Court within three weeks, which shall be disposed of by the said court in strict compliance of the guidelines laid down in the aforesaid cases. 3. The present anticipatory bail applications are accordingly disposed of with the aforesaid observation and direction. (Rajesh Shankar, J. ) Manish A. B. A. No. 5852/2023 & 6527/2024
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.