Sujatha Rao Karengle v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: T.MADHAVI DEVI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-05. Sujatha Rao Karengle v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original J urisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION NO: 37417 OF 2025 Between: sujatha Rao Karengle, wo. Late Krupakar Rao,- Aged about rtat ruo. 3o2, n. X6. to-z-2891 121t49l35l1lA, Krupa Nilayam, Vijaynagar colony, Masab tank, Hyderabad AND 1. The state of Telangana, Rep by its Prl. secretary women, children, - 5OO and Senior CitizenJ(DW) Dept. Secretariat, Hyderabad 2. The District Collectoi ani tvtigistrate, Chairman tribunal for welfare of Parents and Sr. Citizens, Hyderabad 3. The Director and State Commissioner for persons Department for the welfare of disabled and Si. Citizens, Hyderabad' 4. The District Welfare Officer, Women, Children, Disabled Department, HYderabad 5. The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad. 6. The Tahsildar/Mandal Revenue offrcer, Nampally, Hyderabad. 7. Kamala Naini, wo Nrupender Rao, Flat No.
102, 12Ot 4gl35t1 /A, P. S. Nagar, MasabTank, Vijaynagar colony, petition under Article 2Xi of the Constitution of lndia praying circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the Order, more particularly Writ of Mandamus by declaring the inaction the Respondents 2 to 6 particutarly Respondent No. 2 in accordance with Rule 4(1) Maintenance and welfare of Parents and Senior citizens Act, 2007 2OO7) and the Rules of 2O11 framed vide G. O. Ms. No. 40 dated 3011212022, as illegal, ,. } and to direct the arbitrary and in violation of the provisions of the Act 56 of 2oo7 ' RespondentNo. 2todisposeofmyapplicationdatedT-1o-2o2'withoutanyfurther delay l. A. NO: 1 OF 2025 praying that in the circumstances petition uncer order 3g r"ule 1 & 2 of cPC pleased petition, High court may be filed in support of the the stated in the afficavit .
i,th any further ilr treatment towards me Respondent from causing to restrain the pending disposal of the writ petition' Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A'ANANDA C}IARY Counsel for the Respondent No. 1' t u3; FoR woMEN DEv CHTLD *ELFARE Counsel for the Respondent No'2 & 6: GP FOR REVENUE GP FOR HOME Corn""f for the Respondent No's: ORDER The Court marle the following: ,. i I I i I I t , i,t -, r. r, l;:;. _: i-,,, {i. j I ' '1. IN TIIE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELAITGANA AT HYDTRABAI) THE HOITT'BLE SMT. JUSTICE . T. MADIIAVI DE\II WRIT PEtrITION No. 37417 of 2or25 OSth Decemberr 2O2S Between: Sujatha Rao Karengle ... Petitioner AI{D The State of Telangana & 6 others. .. Respondent ORDER In this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking a direction to respondent No. 2 to take action on her application dated 29. 09. 2025 received on O7. LO. 2O25 under Rule 4(1) of the Andhra Pradesh Maintenance of Parents and Senior Citizens Rules, ? OLL (for short 'the Rules'). 2.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Women, Children, Disabled & Senior Citizens (DW) Department appearing for respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4, learned Government Pleader for Revenue TMDJ w_37417 _2025 appearing for respondents No. 2 & 6 and the learned Governrnent for Home appearing for respondent No. S. 3. It is submitted that inspite of receipt of tJ:e applical. ion of the petitioner, no action has been taken by the respondents so far. 4. [earned Government pleader for Women, Children, i Disable,C & Senior Citizens (DW) Department, however, submitted that there is a period of ninety (9O) days for taking *ction as per the Rules and t]. e action qrill be taken ii on the application l: of the petitioner within the prescribed time. 5. Irr view of the above submissions, respondent No. 2 is directecl to take action on the application of tJre petitioner in accordance with the Rules within the prescribed period. 6.
,6rccordir-rgly, this Writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pe:nding in this Writ petition, shall stand closed. I i SD/. T. SRINTVASA REDDY i I ASSTST-ANT BIECISTRAR i //TRUE COPY// (2- I ' SECTION OFFICER : To, 1. The Prl. Secretary Women, Children, Disabled and Senior Citizens (DW) Dept. Sercretariat, Hyderabad - SOO O2i. 2. The Disrrict coflector and Magistrate, chairman tribunar for maintenance and welfare of Parents and Sr. Citizens, Hyderabad 3' The Di'ector and state persons -commisiionui-L. with disabirities, Departrrent for the welfare of disabled anO Sr. Citii-ns, Hyderabad. . i. I women, chirdren, Disabred and : iliff*lHrXt:&lJ,cer, senior citizen 5. The Commissi g rn" iJ,iiiffi:,#I i""[? #r8erabad. 7. One CC to SR 8,! rlti#iii[jfr;:';;^ :. iulif;;il:{flSs#1fr c. u* r. r,he \ bourt ror the \ srare or rehnsana I :10. Two CCs i6*j'iJlf1flH'ffif,if'Hish at to G, i.
' RE,ENUE' Hish court ror the state or reransana ar ;;l#:ztsi{i#,toR BSR e( , a HIGH COURT , DATED: 05/1212025 S a\ ? [1$ 1 5 [Pfr -nr' I \ * u. , ORDER WP. No. 37417 of 2025 . i' ;i ,,: ,. : i DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITI. IOUT COSTS troP o^l
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.