Lakshmipathi Sherla , Laxman Sherla , Lachaiah Sherla v. The District Collector,
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K. SARATH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-12-19. Lakshmipathi Sherla , Laxman Sherla , Lachaiah Sherla v. The District Collector,. Read the...
Judgment text
[ 3302 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH wRlT PETITION NO: 25052 OF 2011 Between Lakshmipathi Sherla, Laxman Sheda, Lachaiah Sherla, or Sherla Laxmaiah, S/o. Sherla Mallaiah RJo. H. No. 4-2-135, Peddapalli, Karimnagar Distnct. ... PET|TIONER AND The District Collector, Karimnagar District at Karimnagar ... RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in. the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may'be pleased to issue an appropnate writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not considering the representation of the petitioner dated 07. O7. 201 1 for necessary publication in the District Gazette.
Karimnagar with regard to the name of the petitioner, as arbrtrary, illegal and contrary to law and consequently direct the respondent heretn to pass appropriate orders on the said representation of the petitioner forthwith. l. A. NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP. NO: 30814 OF 2011 ) Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent herein to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner daled 07. O7. 2O1 1 for necessary publicatbn in the District Gazette, Karimnagar with regard to the name of the petitioner, immediately, pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI CHALLARI NAGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE ,/,/ SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT N No. 25,0,5. 2 of 2OLl ORDER This petition is coming for hearing since 2O11. On O5. L2.
2O24, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, and therefore the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption "for Dismissal". Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation on beha_lf of the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute this case 2. Accordingly, the Writ petition is dismissed for Non-prosecution/default. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any in this u*. petition, shal. l stand closed. SD/- K. SREERAMA M RTHY ASSISTANT REG TRAR t6 //TRUE COPY// \1 SECTION OFF]CER To 1. One CC to SRI CHALLARI NAGESWARA RAO, Advocate tOpUCl 2. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Tetangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies PSK GJP Va IGH COURT DATED:1911212024 ORDER y';'\\^t si^ ,1 WP. No. 25052 of 2011 \' ( -i :: I u. , 0 3 ti-; 7[25 . f * (t ,! 5 p41 rt\\ DISM!
SSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON PROSECUTION/DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS (a' | v\ 13 lz \ -+- 6c
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.