V.BHASKARA RAJU.AND 2 OTHERS. v. V.GANDHI RAJU AND 5 OTHERS.
Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Bench: VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Andhra Pradesh judgment dated 2024-09-10. V.BHASKARA RAJU.AND 2 OTHERS. v. V.GANDHI RAJU AND 5 OTHERS. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
A • IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO FIRST APPEAL NO: 2520 OF 2000 Appeal filed under Section 96 of C. P. C. against the decree & judgment dt. 26- 3-98 made in OS No. 61/90 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Tadepalligudem. Between: 1. Vegesna Bhaskara Raju, S/o Rajagopala Raju, aged 50 years, Hindu, TDPCDMC. Cultivation China Ramachandrapuram H/o Ganapavaram, 2. Vegesna Rajagopala Raju, S/o Bhaskara Raju, aged 11 years, Hindu, Father’s Protection, China Ramachandrapuram H/o Ganapavaram, TDPCDMC. 3. Vegesna Subrahmanya Raju, S/o Bhaskara Raju, aged 6 years, Hindu, Father’s Protection, China Ramachandrapuram H/o Ganapavaram, TDPCDMC. ... (PLAINTIFFS)APPELLANT AND 1. Vegesna, Gandhi Raju, S/o Rajagopala Raju, aged 62 years, Hindu, TPGDMC. Cultivation China Ramachandrapuram, H/o Ganmapavaram, 2. Smt.
Chintalapati Annapurnamma, W/o Potam Raju, aged 60 years,Hindu, Husband’s Protection, Gandhinagar, H/o Ganmapavaram, TPGDMC. f’ 3. Kusampudi Nehru @ Subba Raju, S/o Surapa Raju, aged 30 years, Hindu,Occ: Cultivation Gandhinagar, H/o Ganmapavaram, TPGDMC. 4. Smt. Tottumukkala Vijaya Lakshmi, W/o Rama Bhadra Raju, aged 47 years, Hindu, Husband’s Protection, China Ramachandrapuram, H/o Ganmapavaram, TPGDMC. 5. Nandyala Satyanrayana Raju, S/o Subbaraju, aged 60 years, Hindu, Occ: Cultivation H/o Ganmapavaram, TPGDMC. 6. Gorti Sanyasi Rao, S/o Narayudu, aged 55 years, Hindu,Occ: Cultivation H/o Ganapavaram, TPGDMC. 7. R-6 dismissed for default C. O. dt:22/10/2008. ... (DEFENDANTS)RESPONDENTS I. A. NO: 1 OF 2000rCMP. NO: 18386 OF 2000) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to alienate the plaint schedule property in OS No.
61/90 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Tadepalligudem and not to create any encumbrance in respect of the said property. I. A. NO: 2 OF 2009rASMP. NO: 1568 OF 20091 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct that the above appeal A. S. No. 2520 of 2000 be heard out of turn. e ' I. A. NO: 1 OF 2001fCMP. NO: 14144 OF 2001) circumstances Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be to alienate or otherwise pleased to direct the appellants in above appeal not in OS No. 61/90 create any encumbrance over the plaint schedule property on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Tadepalligudem. Counsel for the Appellant(s):SRI C. RAMACHANDRA RAJU Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: SRI V S R ANJANEYALU Counsel for the Respondents No. 2,3,5: SRI MANOHAR G.
Counsel for the Respondent No. 4: SRI S. V. S. S. SIVA RAM The Court made the following: ORDER (f THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO APPEAL SUIT No. 2520 of 2000 JUDGMENT: 1. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel representing on behalf of the respondents is alone present. Though the matter is listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, there seems that the is no representation on behalf of the appellants. It appellants are not inclined to prosecute the appeal. 2. Therefore, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. shall As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, stand closed. SD/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR " //TRUE COPY// , cA^ •Action officer To, 1. The Senior Civil Judge, Tadepalligudem. (with records) 2. One CC to SRI. C. RAMACHANDRA RAJU, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRI. VSR ANJANEYALU, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to SRI. S V S S SIVA RAM, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Pradesh.
The Section Officer, V. R. Section, High Court of Andhra 6. Three C. D. Copies nm •'Vr -f, ItIIGH court DATED: 10/09/2024 ORDER ITT 1 OCT 2C2'i o 03 f AS. No. 2520 of 2000 ^ . Current Section DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUIT FOR NON-PROSECUTION
Source: High Court of Andhra Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.