NAWAB CHANDA MAIN MOSQUE v. HABIBA BAI
Court: Madras High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
Madras High Court judgment dated 2024-02-27. NAWAB CHANDA MAIN MOSQUE v. HABIBA BAI. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
C. R. P. (NPD). No. 95 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 27. 02. 2024 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR C. R. P. (NPD). No. 95 of 2010 1. Nawab Chanda Main Mosque Tiruvannamalai Rep. By its Mutawalli/(K. Syed Yasin Sahib)(Died) Executive Officer/Superintendent of Waqf, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, Vellore Zone. 2. Tamil Nadu Wakf Board Represented by its Ex. Officio Secretary Chief Executive Officer, Chennai. ... Petitioners (P-1 Substituted vide Court order dated 22. 03. 2018 made in CMP. No. 4963/2018 in CRP. No. 95/2010) vs 1. Habiba Bi 2. S. I. Hayad Basha 3. H. Pareetha Ahamed 1/6 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis C. R. P. (NPD). No. 95 of 2010 4. H. Refeek Ahamed 5. H. Shafeeque Ahamed 6. H. Asma Banu 7. I. Shahjahan Basha 8. S. Jawahar Shakeel 9. Shahith Ahamed 10. Shaheen Ahamed 11. S. Santhanalakshmi 12. S. Rajamani 13. A. Palaniraj 14. R. Selvam 15. The General Manager Southern Railway Chennai – 600 003 ...
Respondents Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the order and decreetal order of the Wakf Tribunal cum Principal Subordinate Judge @ Tiruvannamalai in O. S. No. 93 of 2009, dated 17. 11. 2009 in dismissing the suit for declaration and for injunction. 2/6 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis C. R. P. (NPD). No. 95 of 2010 For Petitioners : Mr. S. Sathya Kumar for M/s. V. Srimathi For R14 : Mr. K. Venatasubban for M/s. Sarvabhauman Associates For R1 to R13 and R15 : Exparte ORDER th It is seen from the records that death of 14 respondent as well as details of legal representatives were informed to the learned counsel for the petitioners as early as 04. 10. 2023. It is also seen from the records that the th learned counsel for the 14 respondent filed a memo dated 12. 12. 2023 giving th the details of the legal representatives of 14 respondent, who died on th 06. 02. 2023.
Along with said memo, the death certificate of 14 respondent is also enclosed. 2. Inspite the same, till date, the petitioners have not taken any steps to th bring on record the legal representatives of deceased 14 respondent. Hence, th the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as against the 14 respondent as abated. th 3. It is also seen from the memorandum of grounds the 14 respondent 3/6 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis C. R. P. (NPD). No. 95 of 2010 is the only contesting party and respondents 1 to 13 and 15 remained exparte before the Court below and hence, the petitioners sought for dispense with of notice to respondents 1 to 13 and 15. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is closed. No costs. 27. 02. 2024 Index : Yes / No Speaking order : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No dm 4/6 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis C. R. P. (NPD). No. 95 of 2010 To 1. The Wakf Tribunal cum Principal Subordinate Judge, Tiruvannamalai. 2. The General Manager Southern Railway Chennai – 600 003.
5/6 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis C. R. P. (NPD). No. 95 of 2010 S. SOUNTHAR, J. dm C. R. P. (NPD). No. 95 of 2010 27. 02. 2024 6/6 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis
Source: Madras High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.