Sri Chayan Pal v. The State of Tripura and 4 Others
Court: High Court of Tripura
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARINDAM LODH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Tripura judgment dated 2024-12-19. Sri Chayan Pal v. The State of Tripura and 4 Others. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA WP(C) No. 791 of 2024 Sri Chayan Pal Upendra Vidyabhaban Girls’ H. S School S/o-Lt. Thakur Chand Pal, Resident of Geetanjali Apartments, H. G. B. Road, P. O. -Agartala, P. S-West Agartala, Dist. -West Tripura, Pin 799001 …. Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Tripura, Represented by the Secretary to the Government of Tripura, Education (School) Department, New Secretariat Building, Capital Complex, Agartala, West Tripura. 2. The Secretary to the Government of Tripura Education (School) Department, New Secretariat Building, Capital Complex, Agartala, West Tripura. 3. The Director cum Joint Secretary, Directorate of Secondary Education, Government of Tripura, Shiksha Bhaban (2nd floor), Office Lane, Agartala, West Tripura. 4. The Commissioner of Departmental Inquiries, Government of Tripura, Office of the Departmental Inquiries, Secretariat Annex, Pandit Nehru Complex, Agartala, Dist. -West Tripura, D. P No. 13/INQ/DP/EDN/2021. 5.
The Chief Secretary, (Appellate Authority), Government of Tripura, Education (School) Department, New Secretariat Building, Agartala. …. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mrs. S. Deb (Gupta), Advocate For respondent(s) : Mr. M. Debbarma, Addl. G. A HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARINDAM LODH Order 19/12/2024 Heard Mrs. S. Deb(Gupta), learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. M. Debbarma, learned Addl. GA appearing for the State-respondents. Mrs. Deb(Gupta), leaned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that a disciplinary proceeding was initiated against the petitioner. On completion of the proceeding, disciplinary authority found him guilty of committing misconduct. According to the said authority, the charge framed by them has been proved. Against the impugned order of penalty, the petitioner had preferred statutory appeal before the appellate authority on 19. 07. 2024.
The appeal was supposed to be disposed of within a period of one month as per relevant provisions of CCS (CCS) Rules, 1965, but till today it has not been disposed of. The petitioner by filing the instant writ petition has sought for a direction upon the appellate authority to dispose of the appeal expeditiously. Mr. Debbarma, learned Addl. GA for the State-respondents has fairly submitted that the appeal will be disposed of within a period of 3(three) weeks since statutory period for disposing the appeal has been expired. Accordingly, the respondents-Appellate Authority is directed to dispose of the appeal within a period of 3(three) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order either by the petitioner or by the learned Addl. GA. With the aforesaid direction, the instant writ petition stands allowed and thus disposed of. JUDGE Rohit Digitally signed SANJAYby SANJAY GHOSH GHOSH Date: 2024. 12. 19 16:39:12 +05'30'
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.