BANK OF BARODA v. THE COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,
Court: High Court of Chhattisgarh
Bench: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMITENDRA KISHORE PRASAD
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Chhattisgarh judgment dated 2025-03-22. BANK OF BARODA v. THE COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
2025:CGHC:13839 Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1498 of 2025 1 - Bank Of Baroda Through Its Authorized Officer, Mr. Anil Srivastava, S/o Lt. Mr. Sharda Prasad Srivastava, Aged About 51 Years, Chief Manager, Rosarb, Regional Office- Bank Of Baroda, Rajkishore Nagar Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C. G. ) Pin Code- 495006 ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The Collector And District Magistrate, District- Janjgeer - Champa (Chhattisgarh). 2 - Mr. Yogeshwar Patle S/o. Mr. Charan Lal Patle Aged About 36 Years Address- Village- Khisora, Baloda, District - Janjgeer-Champa (Chhattisgarh), Pin Code - 495559 (Borrower) 3 - Mrs. Janki Bai Vedram Manhar W/o Vedram Manhar S/o Charan Lal Patle, Address- Village Khisora, Baloda, District - Janjgeer-Champa (Chhattisgarh), Pin Code - 495559 (Borrower) 4 - Mr. Bhuneshwar Patle S/o Mr.
Charan Lal Patle Address - Village Khisora, Baloda, District - Janjgeer- Champa (Chhattisgarh), Pin Code - 495559 (Borrower). 5 - Mr. Charan Lal Patle S/o. Mr. Pardeshi Patle Address- Village Khisora, Baloda, District - Janjgeer-Champa (Chhattisgarh), Pin Code - 495559 (Borrower). 6 - Mr. Bedram Manhar S/o Premlal Manhar Address- Ward No. - 18, Behind Ib Rest House Tahsil- Janjgir, District- Janjgeer-Champa (Chhattisgarh), Pin Code- 495668 (Guarantor) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Mayur Khandelwal, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 22/03/2025 1. None appears for the petitioner to argue the case, yesterday also the matter was called twice, however, no one appeared neither any representation was made to seek any adjournment. Since it was a fresh matter preferred by the Petitioner Bank as such it was adjourned yesterday and it was directed to be listed today.
It appears that the petitioner is not interested in this case. 2. Today, when the matter was called no one appeared. In absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioner, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Raghu Jat Judge
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.