Aleti Anjamma v. Ettaboina Siddi Raju
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: RENUKA YARA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-31. Aleti Anjamma v. Ettaboina Siddi Raju. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
13442) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEIMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4680 OF 2 025 Petition under Artrcle 227 of Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order dated 2511112025 passed in OSSR No. 312612025 on the file of the Court of the Principle Junior Civil Judge at Jangaon. Between: Aletr Anjamma, W/o Rajaiah aged about 50 years Occ: house wife and agriculture R/o Katkur village, Bachannapet Mandal, Jangaon District ... Petitioner/Plaintiff AND 1. Ettaboina Siddi Raju, S/o Late Sri Venkataiah aged about 70 years Occ. Advocate R/o H. No 4 31119, Vikas Nagar Jangaon, Jangaon District. 2. Ganboina [\/ahender, S/o Yellaiah aged about 40 years Occ: govt employee R/o H. No. 6-'14, Appalaya cheruvu Nangnoor, I\/edak Dist. i ..
RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Gudi Madhusudhan Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF'TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (A YARA THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE RENII C. R. P. No. 468O of 2025 Date:31. L2. 2O25 Between: Aleti Anjamma Petitioner AND trttaboina Siddi Raju and another Respondents ORDER: Heard Mr. Gudi Madhusudhan Rt',,dy, learned counsel for the petitiouer. 2. Aggrieved by the docket order dated )j. 11. 2O25 in o. S. S. R. No. 3126 of 2025 on the lile o1 the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge at Janagao r, this Civil Revision Petition is preferred. 3. The case of the revision petitioner is that the (r. S. No. 433 t'Espondent No. 1-Plaintiff has filed suit in of 2Ol9 against Aleti Rajaiah,defendant No. 1 and revision petitioner-defendant No. 2 seeking specific performance and the said suit was dismissed against the revision petitioner-defendant No. 2 and decreed against Mr. Aleti Rajaiah i. e.
, defendant No. 1. While so, E. p. No. 26 of 2O2l was filed for execution of registered saie deed including the property of the revision petitioner. Accordingly, registered sale deed was obtained. While obtaining the registration sale deed, several errors were committed by the trial Court i. e. , E. p. was filed for a direction to execute the registered sale deed including the property of 'revision the petitioner. Mr. R. Rajendra prasad was nominated by the learned Trial Court for registration of sale deed by obtaining his attested signature on the letter addressed to the Tahasildar, Bachannapet, Janagaon. However, the said Mr. R. Rajendra prasad, who is a Junior Assistant in the same Court got the sale deed registered without authorization. @ry ,/ ,/ ,. / In view of these anomalies committed :t I execution of the decree, the revision peti - oner filed W. P. No. i90O3 of 2025 bcfore this Court ind the same was dismissed rvith a direction to prel:r civil suit.
Following the said directions, the revision : etitioner filed suit in o. S. S. R. No. 3l'26 of 2025 and tl-e same was returrred uide impugned docket order datc125. 11. 2025 rnhich is as follou,s: I I ,, "[{ow is this suit maintainable. Hence this sui s returned. " 5. The above docket order is bereft of rea:; )ns as to how the suit is not maintainable. The petiti::ier-appellant cannot even address the objection for corrr riiance as no reason is stated for return. The objecti,) 1s raised on 12. 11. 2025 have been already complied. Since the objections raised are complied, the dockr' order dated 25. Ll. 2025 is liable to be set aside. 6. In the result, this Civil Revision Petiti< n is allowed, setting aside the docket order dated i';. 11. 2025 in O. S. S. R. No. 3126 of 2025 on the hle of the learned i Principal Junior Civil Judge at Janagaor-r, with a direction I I I I to register the suit in case it is otherwise, in order.
The I Registry is directed to return the original docket order I i I I subject to substitution of the same r,r,ith photocopies. I There shall be no order as to costs Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall I I stand closed. SD/. M. OSMAN ALI BAIG ASSISTANT REGIST //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER To, '1 . fhe Principle Junior Crvil Judge at Jangaon(with records if any) 2. One CC to Sri Gudi triladhusudhan Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CD Copies Sa/pst Yx I l HIGH COURT DATED:31/1212025 z:: : :::i::.. - -,. irrE Sf4-)i () ( g v JAl| 20it 2 * * r1) PATCIi ORDER CRP. No. 4680 of 2025 ALLOWING THE CRP ? d\ . : roP' ft,*
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.