Skip to main content
LawSphereX

MURLIDHAR ANANT THAKUR AND ORS v. KAMLAKAR NARAYAN SAMANT (DECEASED THROUGH LRS) GYNESH KAMLAKAR SAMANT AND ANR

Court: Bombay High Court

Judgment date:

Case summary

Bombay High Court judgment dated 2026-08-17. MURLIDHAR ANANT THAKUR AND ORS v. KAMLAKAR NARAYAN SAMANT (DECEASED THROUGH LRS) GYNESH KAMLAKAR SAMANT AND...

Judgment text

2-WP-752-2011. doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 752 OF 2011 ... Petitioners Murlidhar Anant Thakur And Ors. Versus Kamlakar Narayan Samant (deceased Through ... Respondents Lrs) Gynesh Kamlakar Samant And Anr. **** None for the Petitioners. Mr. A. A. Alaspurkar AGP the Respondent/State. Ms. Gauri Bhagwat i/b M/s Divekar Bhagwat & Co. for the Respondent **** CORAM : M. M. SATHAYE, J. th DATE : 17 AUGUST, 2026 On 27. 07. 2026, the following order was passed: “1. None for the Petitioners. Learned counsel for the Respondent No. 1 seeks time to take instructions. 2. Petitioners are challenging the order dated 22. 04. 2010 passed by Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Mumbai dismissing his revision application, confirming order of Tahsildar, Borivali rejecting the claim of Petitioners as deemed purchasers. 3. Stand over to 10. 08. 2026 as an opportunity to Petitioners or their advocate to appear and contest. ” On 10. 08.

2026, the following order was passed: “1. On last occasion, the matter was adjourned as an opportunity to the Petitioners. Today also, none is appearing for the Petitioners. 2. Stand over to 17. 08. 2026. To be listed ‘for dismissal’. ” Navnath Waghmare 1 2-WP-752-2011. doc 3. Today, the matter is listed for dismissal, however, nobody is appearing for the Petitioner. It appears that the Petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter. 4. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed for non prosecution. Interim/ ad-interim relief, if any, stands vacated. 5. All concerned to act on duly authenticated or digitally signed copy of this order. (M. M. SATHAYE, J. ) Navnath Waghmare 2

Source: Bombay High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.