SANTOSH DEVI AND ORS. v. STATE TH.SOCIAL WELFARE DEPTT.AND ORS.
Court: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jammu and Kashmir judgment dated 2025-12-20. SANTOSH DEVI AND ORS. v. STATE TH.SOCIAL WELFARE DEPTT.AND ORS. Read the judgment and case...
Judgment text
Sr. No. 28 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU SWP No. 397/2016 Date of pronouncement: 20. 12. 2025 Uploaded on : . 12. 2025 Santosh Devi, Age 42 years W/o Sh. ..... Petitioner(s) Satish Kumar R/o Village Khelaya, Tehsil and District Doda And seven others Through :- None v/s 1. State of Jammu and Kashmir, through Commissioner/Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of J&K, Civil Secretariat, Srinagar/Jammu. 2. The Director Social Welfare Department, Jammu 3. State Mission Director, ICDS, J&K Government, Jammu. 4. The District Programme Officer, ICDS, Doda 5. Child & Development Project Officer, Marmat, District Doda. ..... Respondent(s) Through :- Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE ORDER 20. 12. 2025 1. The petitioners were temporarily engaged as Anganwari Workers/Helpers on adhoc basis. Their appointment was not according to the Rules but was only a stop gap arrangement to make the Anganwari Centres functional.
The petitioners were, later on, disengaged by the Mission Director, ICDS, J&K vide order dated 22. 04. 2015. The disengagement was made on the ground that they were continued despite having been appointed only on a stop gap arrangement without following any process of law. It is this order of the Mission Director, ICDS, J&K, which has been called in question by the petitioners in this petition. 2. This petition came up for consideration on 29. 02. 2016, when this Court while issuing notice to the respondents for filing objections, directed the parties to maintain status quo. Indisputably, the petitioners were nd disengaged on 22 April, 2015, whereas the interim direction was th passed on 29 February, 2016. We are not sure whether the petitioners are continuing in service or not. 3. Mr. Gupta, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the order impugned in this petition i. e. Order No. 13-SMD of 2015 dated 22. 04. 2015 was quashed by the learned Single Judge in SWP No.
1222/2015 and other clubbed matters, which judgment of the learned Single Judge has been upheld by the Division Bench vide its judgment th dated 24 August, 2023 passed in LPA No. 140/2021 and other connected matters. It is submitted that that since the order impugned in this petition stands quashed, as such, this petition has been rendered infructuous. 4. Be that as it may, having regard to the submission made by Mr. Gupta, learned AAG, this petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 24. 08. 2023 passed in LPA No. 140/2021 and clubbed matters. (Sanjeev Kumar) Judge JAMMU 20. 12. 2025 Vinod. Whether order is speaking: Yes/No Whether order is reportable: Yes/No Vinod Kumar 2025. 12. 23 13:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Source: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.