GAUTAM DEY ALIAS GAUTAM KUMAR DEY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH CHAND
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2024-01-05. GAUTAM DEY ALIAS GAUTAM KUMAR DEY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Rev. No. 155 of 2022 Gautam Dey @ Gautam Kumar Dey ..... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …. …. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH CHAND ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Kr. Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Anuradha Sahay, APP -------- 06/05. 01. 2024 Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State are present. The instant criminal revision has been directed against the order dated 10. 01. 2022 passed by the learned Additional Judicial Commissioner- VI, Ranchi in Sessions Trial No. 509 of 2021, G. R. No. 2735 of 2021 (arising out of Kanke P. S. Case No. 59 of 2021 under sections 498A, 326, 307 of the Indian Penal Code; subsequently added section 302 of the IPC and charge-sheet submitted under section 306 of the IPC), whereby the learned trial court has framed the charge against the petitioner. From perusal of the impugned order dated 10. 01.
2022 it is found that while framing charge against the petitioner/accused by the learned trial court; neither the oral objection was made nor the discharge application was moved on behalf of the petitioner. The charge was framed by the learned trial court and after having explained and read over the same the accused denied the charge and claimed for trial. As such this criminal revision is not maintainable against the impugned order. In view of the above, this criminal revision is dismissed being not maintainable at the stage of admission. (Subhash Chand, J. ) RKM
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Archive: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.