PARAMJIT SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB
Court: High Court of Punjab and Haryana
Bench: MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Punjab and Haryana judgment dated 2020-12-09. PARAMJIT SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
CRM-M No. 39638 of 2020 -1- In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh CRM-M No. 39638 of 2020 Date of Decision: 09. 12. 2020 Paramjit Singh ...... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL Present: Mr. Simranjit Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M. S. Nagra, AAG, Punjab. **** HARNARESH SINGH GILL, J. (ORAL) Case is taken up for hearing through video conferencing. The petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No. 63 dated 24. 6. 2019 under Sections 323, 324, 148, 149 IPC and Sections 307, 326 IPC (added subsequently) IPC registered at Police Station Ghuman, District Gurdaspur. Custody certificate by way of affidavit of Deputy Superintendent, Central Jail, Kapurthala has been filed through e-mail. Copy of the same is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is case of version and cross-version and the petitioner has also suffered three injuries as well and he has also filed a criminal complaint against the complainant party which is pending. He further submits that out of 24 prosecution witnesses, no witness has been examined till date. Learned counsel further submits that the present FIR has been registered against 08 persons 2020. 12. 11 17:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chadigarh CRM-M No. 39638 of 2020 -2-including the petitioner, out of which 05 persons have been declared innocent and challan has been presented against three accused, out of which, two accused have been granted bail. On the other hand, learned State counsel submits that it was the petitioner, who hit the tractor of complaint's father, namely Harjinder Singh, with his tractor, and as a result of this, Harjinder Singh fell down.
Thereafter, petitioner-Paramjit Singh and Sarbabjit Singh caught hold their datars and the petitioner gave a datar blow upon Harjinder Singh which hit on his head. The petitioner also gave a datar blow to the complainant which hit on his forehead. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned State counsel. In the present case, there are specific allegations against the petitioner that he gave a datar blow on the head of the father of the complainant with an intention to kill him and also gave a datar blow to the complainant which hit on his forehead. Thus, serious injuries have been attributed to the petitioner. The petitioner had caused injury on the head of the complainant's father, which is a vital part of the body. The allegations against the petitioner are serious in nature. No ground for grant of regular bail to the petitioner is made out. The petition is dismissed.
(HARNARESH SINGH GILL) JUDGE December 09, 2020 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2020. 12. 11 17:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chadigarh
Source: High Court of Punjab and Haryana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.